Home · Register · Software · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              113      
114
       115              122       123       end
  

The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread
  
 
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.114 #1 · p.114 #1 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Anden wrote:
I started this thread with the first version Rollei. I now have the Contax AEG.
I haven't used the MMG or MMJ.

From my tests the rollei and the contax was equal. The bokeh is the difference.



you mean the triangles or is there a difference wide open?





Sep 04, 2014 at 07:43 AM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.114 #2 · p.114 #2 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


also a baby:









Sep 04, 2014 at 07:45 AM
Anden
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #3 · p.114 #3 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


The triangles. Mind you that my tests were based on real life shooting. No controlled tests.

sebboh wrote:
you mean the triangles or is there a difference wide open?






Sep 04, 2014 at 08:01 AM
aly324
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #4 · p.114 #4 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Steve Spencer wrote:
The Voigtlander 35 f/1.2 is still in the running, however, but as odd as it may seem I think the like the bokeh from the lux pre-asph better than the Voigtlander. As the pre-asph stops down it seems to have very nice bokeh and I am not overly offended by the funky bokeh wide open. The Voigt on the other hand has nice bokeh at times, but exactly the kind of bokeh I don't like at others, so I am torn. I got a long time to decide, however. I probably won't pick up a 35 for the A7
...Show more
Steve Spencer wrote:
it doesn't look like the loxia 35 f/2 will be a solution for me either. At this point I think I am most likely to get a 35 lux pre-asph for something small and keep the ZE when I want to shoot wide open with good bokeh. The Voigtlander 35 f/1.2 is still in the running, however, but as odd as it may seem I think the like the bokeh from the lux pre-asph better than the Voigtlander.


Hi there, sorry to jump in mid-conversation. I've been on a mini personal quest to determine whether my dislike of the Voigtlander 35/1.2 is justified (and finding very little agreement from others). I have the CY D35, Leica R Lux 35, and an ASPH pre-FLE 35. All these have much more pleasing and gentle rendition than the CV.

I used 3 copies of the CV on my A7R. While the resolution and ergonomics were quite good (not too light like Leica M's, no need to focus with my knuckle/finger tip), I simply couldn't get along with the image. It seemed to lack microcontrast, have too much macrocontrast, and often yield bizarre brassy chemical colors. The somewhat stronger vignetting (than the Contax and Lux R) also adds an unnecessary sense of drama. The signature is unmistakably contemporary, which I dislike.

Here's a photo to illustrate what I mean by bizarre colors. The CV seems liable to grab on to certain parts of the color spectrum and exaggerate them (does this make sense optically?) I have also seen it respond bizarrely to evening sky, turning a pale blue ultra-blue. Perhaps the A7R sensor and processor are partly at fault here.

This photo was shot RAW, AWB, and processed in Lightroom using the Medium Contrast Profile and nothing more. No amount of adjustment would fix it. Granted the vintage 35's also can get tripped up by challenging light, but this wasn't particularly challenging, and the result is one of the worst I've ever seen from any lens.

If I decrease saturation, the image simply looks hollow and untrue, and as is it is exaggerated and untrue. So for me the CV very often (in my case, almost always) manages to come up with images that are paradoxically both hyperbolic and lacking.







Edited on Sep 04, 2014 at 03:02 PM · View previous versions



Sep 04, 2014 at 02:48 PM
aly324
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #5 · p.114 #5 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Mescalamba wrote:
MMs are servicable by Zeiss (I hope that is still valid) and they dont have so-called ninja bokeh (different aperture blades). Also MMs are adaptable to any mount, while AE are Canon EF only. Sometimes there are some design updates, sometimes not.. unsure about 35/1.4.


Ninja aperture openings happen as you move past wide open and stops when you reach 2 stops from wide open. This has been true in my experience of 8 or so AE type lenses.

I also read somewhere that early copies of the Contax AE 35/1.4 used a ground aspherical elemenet, which results in a slight swirly pattern in the bokeh, whereas late AE copies (and certainly MM copies) used a pressed asphere. I am not sure if there's any truth in this. And it's possible that I misremember and the division is more between AE and MM.

But my current early D35 does have the swirls.



Sep 04, 2014 at 02:52 PM
Steve Spencer
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #6 · p.114 #6 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


aly324 wrote:
Ninja aperture openings happen as you move past wide open and stops when you reach 2 stops from wide open. This has been true in my experience of 8 or so AE type lenses.

I also read somewhere that early copies of the Contax AE 35/1.4 used a ground aspherical elemenet, which results in a slight swirly pattern in the bokeh, whereas late AE copies (and certainly MM copies) used a pressed asphere. I am not sure if there's any truth in this. And it's possible that I misremember and the division is more between AE and MM.

But my current
...Show more

If you are talking about onion ring patterns in the OOF highlights both ground asphericals and pressed asphericals tend to have them. Hand ground asphericals tend to show them a bit less depending on the quality of the grinding job and the tools used. Pressed asphericals always show them (with the notably exception of the new Panny/Leica 42.5 f/1.2 for m4/3rds) because of the moulds used in the pressing process. Swirly patterns in the bokeh are caused by lens aberrations and can be seen in quite a few lenses including many without aspherical elements, but I have never noticed them much with the Distagon 35 f/1.4.



Sep 04, 2014 at 03:38 PM
aly324
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #7 · p.114 #7 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Thanks Steve for the correct info. I was talking about onion ring patterns. In my early D35 I see them in OOF highlights. Am I right to assume that onion rings from hand-ground aspheres should generally be less "perfect" than those from pressed ones? I used the word swirly wrongly. The onion rings I see are still concentric, not swirly, but they irregular and indefinite, varying in brightness and thickness, etc. I'm assuming the onions from pressed aspheres should be more uniform.


Sep 04, 2014 at 06:00 PM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.114 #8 · p.114 #8 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


random crap, all wide open with the c/y AEG version:
























Sep 05, 2014 at 06:03 AM
Mescalamba
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.114 #9 · p.114 #9 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


MF and 3D look.. Damn, those are good.


Sep 05, 2014 at 08:44 AM
aly324
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #10 · p.114 #10 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


some from beijing past winter, contax aeg d35 on a7r



























Sep 07, 2014 at 04:09 AM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



Anden
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #11 · p.114 #11 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


My brother and his soon to be wife.



Anden 2014




Sep 07, 2014 at 10:53 AM
tjack
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #12 · p.114 #12 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Not sure if this has been posted.

New Zeiss Distagon ZM 35mm 1.4 to be announced at Photokina[



Sep 08, 2014 at 12:27 AM
genji
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #13 · p.114 #13 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Flowers and leaves (Contax Distagon MMJ)






















Sep 08, 2014 at 11:25 AM
aly324
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #14 · p.114 #14 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


D35 AEG

A couple of film shots from the Bay Area using the Contax AX (I think?). I miss both camera and place.

Plus one of the Old Faithful on a 6D.


















Sep 08, 2014 at 06:05 PM
aly324
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #15 · p.114 #15 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Also check out the music of this Mongolian throat-singer-rocker Tulegur Gangzi:



D35AEG A7R







Sep 08, 2014 at 06:10 PM
carstenw
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.114 #16 · p.114 #16 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Great photo, fantastic song! I was shocked at the end when 10 people clapped, the acoustics made it sound like a huge hall.


Sep 08, 2014 at 06:24 PM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.114 #17 · p.114 #17 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


hmm, should we let the new zm 35/1.4 in this thread?

a few from today, all wide open (probably):



















Sep 16, 2014 at 04:19 AM
sebboh
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.114 #18 · p.114 #18 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


bump:














Sep 20, 2014 at 08:11 AM
Anden
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.114 #19 · p.114 #19 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Nice Sebboh!


Sep 22, 2014 at 10:47 AM
wfrank
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.114 #20 · p.114 #20 · The official Zeiss 35/1.4 thread


Cant have this thread falling behind all the time. CY here.




Sep 24, 2014 at 09:42 PM
1       2       3              113      
114
       115              122       123       end






FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              113      
114
       115              122       123       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password