pixelblurr Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #15 · Help!: Blurry pics with new 5D.2! | |
Hello everyone,
Thank you for your response and suggestions. I'll try to post some crops, I just figured RAW would be better since it's unmolested and there won't be questions about what RAW converter. I shot RAW+JPEG and the medium resolution JPEGs were so soft, I immediately went to the RAW. I am looking at the point of focus when complaining about sharpness (I use DPP to tell me what is in focus), not just the whole image, although the whole image seems disappointing as well.
I'm a seasoned Electrical Engineer so none of the technical aspects scare me or mystify me. To those who are suggesting books, etc, thanks, I appreciate all of that and I have several books on the subject, and I do have a good grasp on the theory, shutter speeds, aperture, focus modes, I understand DoF, it's relationship to aperture, how an exposure is really = shutter*aperture*available_light_flux, what ISO does, etc, etc. And yes, I have read the manual several times.
BUT!! I am NOT saying I didn't do anything wrong here (i.e. too slow shutter) or that I couldn't use more education. I actually figured 1/60 to 1/100 shutter would be good enough even without a tripod at my focal lengths, especially if using the 24-105. Some of the shots are "wide-open" at f/4 (bird picture).
I mostly used center point focus since on the 5D.2 that is supposed to be the most accurate (cross-type sensitivity) and when using the 24-105L I tried to allow enough "settling time" on the stabilizer. I tried to avoid using the outer focus points since they are not cross-type sensitivity.
Tonight I'll try some controlled tests with a tripod and my handy A520 to compare as well + crops of the RAW->JPEG.
I know it's a poor craftsman who blames his tools, I have plenty of people who report to me who do this sometimes (and they're usually wrong). I'm just looking for some help in verifying my tools are up to spec.
Thanks again,
Henry.
|