fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2009 · 16-85mm for portrait work

  
 
Visuals
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · 16-85mm for portrait work


Has anyone ever used it in this capacity?
Do you have any examples?

Thanks guys



Nov 17, 2009 at 12:49 AM
clickmepp
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · 16-85mm for portrait work


Very good focal length range for full body to head shot, preferably for indoor studio shoot with strobes...Since I don't have I can,t comment on the quality of the lens.....


Nov 17, 2009 at 02:14 AM
Gregory.Rotter
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · 16-85mm for portrait work


Not exactly a bokeh machine at f4.5 aperture at 85mm.


Nov 17, 2009 at 02:57 AM
blackfeather
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · 16-85mm for portrait work


...I use this lens on my D300 for corporate, and business headshots (studio), and it serves very well. I actually use a Tiffen "soft efx 2" on the lens to knock it down a little...it's very sharp.


Nov 17, 2009 at 07:09 AM
slick2000
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · 16-85mm for portrait work


Gregory.Rotter wrote:
Not exactly a bokeh machine at f4.5 aperture at 85mm.

at 85mm is f5.6, so not good at all for portraits

Nik



Nov 17, 2009 at 08:50 AM
plubbry
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · 16-85mm for portrait work


My 16-85 is very sharp throughout the range but does soften a smidge as you approach 85mm. It doesn't have all that great of bokeh, which is the worst around 50mm. I would think that for studio work it would perform well though. I will have to look for some examples.


Nov 17, 2009 at 09:56 AM
blcknspo0ln
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · 16-85mm for portrait work


I liked my 16-85VR for studio work. I was a novice at photoshopping at the time, so excuse the fringing.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2735/4112761026_8713775328.jpg

Some other samples, I don't have the EXIF, but I'm 100% I used the 16-85VR.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3163/2850013678_eeb5246263.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3258/2849182329_3d46362698.jpg

Just a side note, if you are looking for a dedicated tele/portrait shooter (and cheap!), most definitely look into the 85 1.8. It makes me wonder why I never got one years ago.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2763/4107087851_319869ec12.jpg



Nov 17, 2009 at 12:02 PM
Visuals
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · 16-85mm for portrait work


Thanks for your comments guys


Dec 01, 2009 at 12:37 AM
Robert Spencer
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #9 · 16-85mm for portrait work


Thom Hogan says this is a very sharp lens but maybe a bit over priced:
http://www.bythom.com/Nikkor16-85lensreview.htm
I have to agree that the 85 1.8 is the best bang for the $$$$. Take care. Bob



Dec 01, 2009 at 12:44 PM
Rodolfo Paiz
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #10 · 16-85mm for portrait work


Love the price/performance of the 85/1.8, but that octagonal bokeh somehow bothers me. For portraits, I'd get a manual-focus 105/2.5 AIS for $200 or so, or a 105/2DC or 135/2DC if I had the cash. Haven't made friends with the razor-thin DOF of the 85/1.4 yet.



Dec 01, 2009 at 01:00 PM
MagicNikon
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #11 · 16-85mm for portrait work


I always found that I needed to stop down a notch or two at 85mm to match the sharpness at the lower FL's. I didn't rely on it to do portraits.


Dec 02, 2009 at 07:17 AM





FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account