millsart Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
phatnev wrote:
No better IQ, but its actually better for travel since its a sturdy body that will hold up over time and being put in a bag over and over.
I guess it depends if your concept of travel is going down the Amazon in a canoe for a 3 month National Geographic assignment, or going to modern civilization and staying in hotels, taking the subway or taxi etc. I've had my D5k on a number of trips and certainly haven't had issues with taking it in and out of the bag causing it to wear out lol.
Again I guess to each his own but for me, the very fact its not a sturdy body, or a "toy" is the whole reason I reach for it in the first place. If I want something substantial and well made, a D700 or D3 (really not a huge weight difference between) is what I take, but thats exactly what I try to avoid when traveling light.
I actually just bought a G1 system to try to have an even lighter travel kit now, loving that so far. The camera body, 14-45 and 45-200 lens all total weight the same as just the D700 body by itself. I'll probably pick up a couple of M mount primes and adapter as well as the 7-14mm and I'll be able to have an equiv 14-400mm range in a kit that weights only 4lbs and can be carried in 2 jacket pockets. I've got a little folding tripod that folds down to about 12" as well that supports it just fine and I can fit that in my carry on as well. Thats so nice these days where they charge you to check a bag as I'd usually always check a duffle with my big CF tripod and accessories along with some clothes because there was no way to carry it on. Now I can carry a full kit in my carry on roller along with clothes and whatever else I need and even if I'm going for a short day or 2 day trip still take have the ability to make some nice images on my downtime. But I guess this is all reall something for another thread lol
|