gugs Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
I don't know about the HSM version but the previous version of the same lens is not a top performer, you are better off with a Tamron 17-50 2.8, the best cheap performer in that range. The AF, however, will probably be slower than with the HSM version. And using a cheap piece of plastic on a D3, and not even shoot in FX mode, does not make sense at all, as far as I am concerned. You could at least go for a lens like the Tamron 28-75 2.8, if you want a cheap but high quality option.
Guy
|