What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell	Search Used
1 2 3 end

Archive 2009 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

DavidP
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #1 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

Just once I'd like to see somebody take equivalent lenses (say the 50/1.0 and 50 Noctilux) and mount them on the same camera body (say a 1Ds-II), and then take the EXACT SAME IMAGE.

It has to be a still subject, with the same CONTROLLED lighting, focusing/composing EXACTLY the same shot (allowing for slight differences in actual focal length of the two lenses, of course).

Then, process the shots EXACTLY the same.

Then, see if anybody can actually tell the difference (a double-blind experiment would be best).

Nov 05, 2009 at 04:21 PM

gasrocks
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #2 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

I have been using the Leica 180/2, only at f/2, for pix of my kittens outside. One day I tried my EF 135/2 with AF on just for comparison. Did not keep any of those pix.

Nov 05, 2009 at 04:25 PM

SLD
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #3 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

gasrocks wrote:
I have been using the Leica 180/2, only at f/2, for pix of my kittens outside.

I thought you were talking about using the 180/2 manually focusing for the BIF shots

Nov 05, 2009 at 04:38 PM

gasrocks
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #4 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

I hear you about testing lenses side by side. Once, when I wanted to compare 14 different 135mm lenses I owned I put them on the camera one at a time and walked outside and took shots at different apertures, etc. Came back inside made notes and then went out with the next lens. Took hours to do. In that time the sun moved, clouds appeared, light changed. To the point where there was no way to compare any of the results. Later a better testing method came to me. I own 2 cameras of the same body. One on each shoulder, go outside shoot at different apertures and quick, before the light changes, do the same from the same spot with the other camera. Very easy to compare lenses that way. But, only 2 at a time.

Nov 05, 2009 at 04:39 PM

trajan
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #5 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

gasrocks wrote:
I have been using the Leica 180/2, only at f/2, for pix of my kittens outside. One day I tried my EF 135/2 with AF on just for comparison. Did not keep any of those pix.
Try to be more cryptic.

Seriously, it's confusing. Which pics didn't you keep?

--trajan

Nov 05, 2009 at 05:08 PM

PetKal
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #6 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

lidesun wrote:
gasrocks wrote:
I have been using the Leica 180/2, only at f/2, for pix of my kittens outside.

I thought you were talking about using the 180/2 manually focusing for the BIF shots

That's what I thought too. Especially at 180mm or 200mm FL, it is difficult enough to get fast action shots with a good camera AF system and a fast AF lens, let alone trying to MF. Even if we assume that Leica 180mm f/2 has a "pure" IQ similar to 200 f/1.8 or 200 f/2.0 IS, those Canon lenses ought to have a decisive advantage in photography types where one needs (or benefits from) auto operation and IS.

Nov 05, 2009 at 05:12 PM

gasrocks
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #7 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

I did not keep any of the images shot with the EF 135/2. They just did not appeal to me after looking at all the shots taken, of the same subjects, with the 180. I thought semi-wild kittens outdoors was tough enough to do with manual exposure and manual focus, handheld. 180 to me is not long enough for birds, at least not where I live.

Nov 05, 2009 at 05:22 PM

PetKal
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #8 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

For sports, wildlife and such, I feel it is just neither feasible nor fair to compare modern auto lenses, especially if provisioned with USM and IS, to any manual lenses in similar FL and aperture.

In fact, we don't even have to go to Canon's top of the line lenses like 200 f/1.8 and 200 f/2.0 IS. Even much cheaper lenses like 200 f/2.8 prime (1) and 135L(2) perform very nicely for what I like to photograph. In the end, fast action is fast action, therefore I try to suggest these two lenses as great value alternatives to the 200 f/2 IS (and 200 f/1.8).
For many folks, getting 80% performance for 15% cost may be a good way to go.

200 f/2.8 and 135L in action.

Edited on Nov 06, 2009 at 03:31 AM · View previous versions

Nov 05, 2009 at 05:47 PM

DavidP
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #9 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

PetKal wrote:
Especially at 180mm or 200mm FL, it is difficult enough to get fast action shots with a good camera AF system and a fast AF lens, let alone trying to MF.

Actually, it's very simple. Just wait until they get to the point where "infinity focus" gives acceptable sharpness.

Oh, you wanted them to occupy a meaningful portion of the frame?

Nov 05, 2009 at 06:59 PM

DavidP
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #10 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

PetKal wrote:
200 f/2.8 and 135L in action.

You must have very tame ducks where you live.

Spoonbills at what I consider relatively short range require 400mm+ shots, IMO.

This is the 500/4 IS + 1.4x-II TC on the 1D-2.

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Nov 05, 2009 at 07:01 PM

trajan
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #11 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

DavidP wrote:
PetKal wrote:
Especially at 180mm or 200mm FL, it is difficult enough to get fast action shots with a good camera AF system and a fast AF lens, let alone trying to MF.

Actually, it's very simple. Just wait until they get to the point where "infinity focus" gives acceptable sharpness.

And how would the bokeh look in that case?

--trajan

Nov 05, 2009 at 07:02 PM

PetKal
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #12 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

DavidP wrote:
PetKal wrote:
200 f/2.8 and 135L in action.

You must have very tame ducks where you live.

Spoonbills at what I consider relatively short range require 400mm+ shots, IMO.

This is the 500/4 IS + 1.4x-II TC on the 1D-2.

That bird is done in the best taste.......framing, background and colours.

I use around 200mm a lot because I have a good access to targets appropriate for such FL. Consequently, have the luxury of trying all kinds of 200mm (or shorter) lenses always on the same targets/action......mostly 200 /1.8, 200 f/2.0, 200 f/2.8 and 135L. Although I'd say the 200 f/2 performs best in that kinda photographic environment, the other lenses are not that far behind either. Especially 135L is lightning quick and plenty good IQ, albeit a bit short.

Nov 05, 2009 at 07:18 PM

Steve Spencer
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #13 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

Although I almost always shoot birds using autofocus, some people with good skills can do an amazing job shooting birds (even in flight) with manual focus. Check out this sight in which all his shots are manual focus with Leica lenses:

http://www.wildlightphoto.com/

Doug Herr is the photographer and he goes by telyt around here on FM and I find his shots terrific.

I don't have any birds in flight, but I do have this butterfly in flight that I got lucky and caught with manual focus. So it is even possible with meager skills sometimes.

2012 © Steve Spencer

Nov 05, 2009 at 07:39 PM

Yakim Peled
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #14 · What's your favorite? 200/1.8 or 200/2

gasrocks wrote:
Once, when I wanted to compare 14 different 135mm lenses I owned ....

Man, and I thought I am obsessive.

Happy shooting,
Yakim.

Nov 09, 2009 at 09:00 AM

1 2 3 end
FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell 1 2 3 end