Register · Search · Software · Join Upload & Sell · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews
FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Upload & Sell   
Search Used
1
2
3 4 end
  

Archive 2009 · Lens fangus protection
  
 
Lars Johnsson
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Lens fangus protection


Breitling65 wrote:
Resent extremely wet/humid weather in my area (NJ) pushed me to buy dehumidifier for lens protection reason. I ran it last night and it gets about 2-3 liters of water per about 8 hours of run in small room I am storing my lenses.
Scary fact even I am not in tropics area, especially since my lens insurance doesn't cover molds related issues (verified)....

What about you?


I have been shooting in Thailand and S.E.Asia for 25 years without any fungus problems. And there is really really wet/humid compared to any parts of US. All the Thai photographers I'm shooting with, have been shooting and keeping their lenses in that environment their whole life without any problems

Nov 02, 2009 at 06:54 PM
Suparman Widja
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #2 · Lens fangus protection


I use this inside a rubbermaid box:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000H0XFD2/ref=oss_T15_product

I use this to measure the humidity:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0007VWEQA/ref=oss_T15_product

Nov 02, 2009 at 07:06 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #3 · Lens fangus protection


globalkiwi wrote:
+1 Bad weather doesn't necessarily affect humidity that much (esp. indoors). This is New Jersey we're talking about, it simply doesn't get that humid there at this time of the year.



Ok, with this person I prefer to talk numbers

NJ, October 2009:

Highest temperature: 79F
Humidity: 87%

All taken from:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KNJSOMER15&day=31&year=2009&month=10&graphspan=month

Nov 02, 2009 at 07:10 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #4 · Lens fangus protection


Lars Johnsson wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
Resent extremely wet/humid weather in my area (NJ) pushed me to buy dehumidifier for lens protection reason. I ran it last night and it gets about 2-3 liters of water per about 8 hours of run in small room I am storing my lenses.
Scary fact even I am not in tropics area, especially since my lens insurance doesn't cover molds related issues (verified)....

What about you?


I have been shooting in Thailand and S.E.Asia for 25 years without any fungus problems. And there is really really wet/humid compared to any parts of US. All the Thai photographers I'm shooting with, have been shooting and keeping their lenses in that environment their whole life without any problems



I would say yes it is safe in general and I believe you, but also not as expensive to get this box to make sure it is Ok with humidity in storage room. It would be much more trouble to get fangus inside $3-$5k lens and no support from insurance ...

Nov 02, 2009 at 07:43 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #5 · Lens fangus protection


RobertLynn wrote:
Take your lenses out and use them. UV light whoops some fungus butt.



Don't forget that is requared removing all this UV(0) filters off the lenses

Nov 02, 2009 at 07:46 PM
globalkiwi
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #6 · Lens fangus protection


Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
+1 Bad weather doesn't necessarily affect humidity that much (esp. indoors). This is New Jersey we're talking about, it simply doesn't get that humid there at this time of the year.



Ok, with this person I prefer to talk numbers

NJ, October 2009:

Highest temperature: 79F
Humidity: 87%

All taken from:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KNJSOMER15&day=31&year=2009&month=10&graphspan=month


That was the highpoint for the month! The low was 20% & the average 50.2 %. I think you are worrying unnecessarily.

Nov 02, 2009 at 07:47 PM
cgardner
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #7 · Lens fangus protection


Not to worry, you have an early warning system: you'll start growing fungus and mold before the camera does because you are a better growth medium

You should worry more about what happens in winter when you bring your freezing cold camera from outdoors into the warmer air indoors. The moisture from the higher relative humidity indoors can cause condensation inside the lens and other camera surfaces. For that reason its best to seal the camera in an airtight bag and let its temperature reach that of the room before opening and operating. Same for stuff fresh off the UPS truck in January.

Nov 02, 2009 at 08:10 PM
plubbry
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #8 · Lens fangus protection


If you want to ease your worries get a pair of hydometers that will report the % relative humidity for your storage room. Use these to verify that your dehumidifier is keeping the space between 40% and 60% relative humidity.

I don't have the link off hand for reference but the majority of fungus grows in sustained 60% or higher relative humidity. Fungus is also more likely to grow on equipment that is both stored in a high humidity environment and is not used very often. Also, there are different types of fungus, though not as common, that thrive at very low humidity (30% and lower primarily).

Nov 02, 2009 at 08:31 PM
lovinglife
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #9 · Lens fangus protection


Move to california
should take care of the issues.

(joking of course)

Nov 02, 2009 at 08:52 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #10 · Lens fangus protection


globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
+1 Bad weather doesn't necessarily affect humidity that much (esp. indoors). This is New Jersey we're talking about, it simply doesn't get that humid there at this time of the year.



Ok, with this person I prefer to talk numbers

NJ, October 2009:

Highest temperature: 79F
Humidity: 87%

All taken from:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KNJSOMER15&day=31&year=2009&month=10&graphspan=month


That was the highpoint for the month! The low was 20% & the average 50.2 %. I think you are worrying unnecessarily.



I don't think you are getting this page information correctly, it is also saying Low -49.5 °F for temperature. I don't recall this temperature this year. What you saw is historical, probably in 100 years old period or something.


Nov 02, 2009 at 08:56 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #11 · Lens fangus protection


epuja wrote:
Move to california
should take care of the issues.

(joking of course)



Maybe San Francisco would be good, should be low in humidity?

Nov 02, 2009 at 08:58 PM
globalkiwi
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #12 · Lens fangus protection


Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
+1 Bad weather doesn't necessarily affect humidity that much (esp. indoors). This is New Jersey we're talking about, it simply doesn't get that humid there at this time of the year.



Ok, with this person I prefer to talk numbers

NJ, October 2009:

Highest temperature: 79F
Humidity: 87%

All taken from:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KNJSOMER15&day=31&year=2009&month=10&graphspan=month


That was the highpoint for the month! The low was 20% & the average 50.2 %. I think you are worrying unnecessarily.



I don't think you are getting this page information correctly, it is also saying Low -49.5 °F for temperature. I don't recall this temperature this year. What you saw is historical, probably in 100 years old period or something.


No mate, I'm quoting the monthly info. for October 2009. Honestly, I think you can relax, your lenses aren't in imminent danger of fungus attacks.

Nov 02, 2009 at 09:01 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #13 · Lens fangus protection


globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
+1 Bad weather doesn't necessarily affect humidity that much (esp. indoors). This is New Jersey we're talking about, it simply doesn't get that humid there at this time of the year.



Ok, with this person I prefer to talk numbers

NJ, October 2009:

Highest temperature: 79F
Humidity: 87%

All taken from:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KNJSOMER15&day=31&year=2009&month=10&graphspan=month


That was the highpoint for the month! The low was 20% & the average 50.2 %. I think you are worrying unnecessarily.



I don't think you are getting this page information correctly, it is also saying Low -49.5 °F for temperature. I don't recall this temperature this year. What you saw is historical, probably in 100 years old period or something.


No mate, I'm quoting the monthly info. for October 2009. Honestly, I think you can relax, your lenses aren't in imminent danger of fungus attacks.



Who said I am not relaxed? I am not getting point of your arguments, that is the main problem.

Nov 02, 2009 at 09:19 PM
 



Jeff_Stapleton
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #14 · Lens fangus protection


I just hate getting fangus

Nov 02, 2009 at 09:27 PM
globalkiwi
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #15 · Lens fangus protection


Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
+1 Bad weather doesn't necessarily affect humidity that much (esp. indoors). This is New Jersey we're talking about, it simply doesn't get that humid there at this time of the year.



Ok, with this person I prefer to talk numbers

NJ, October 2009:

Highest temperature: 79F
Humidity: 87%

All taken from:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KNJSOMER15&day=31&year=2009&month=10&graphspan=month


That was the highpoint for the month! The low was 20% & the average 50.2 %. I think you are worrying unnecessarily.



I don't think you are getting this page information correctly, it is also saying Low -49.5 °F for temperature. I don't recall this temperature this year. What you saw is historical, probably in 100 years old period or something.


No mate, I'm quoting the monthly info. for October 2009. Honestly, I think you can relax, your lenses aren't in imminent danger of fungus attacks.



Who said I am not relaxed? I am not getting point of your arguments, that is the main problem.


The gist is: you are not in a high humidity area, your lenses aren't likely to be invaded by fungus.

Nov 02, 2009 at 09:39 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #16 · Lens fangus protection


globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
Breitling65 wrote:
globalkiwi wrote:
+1 Bad weather doesn't necessarily affect humidity that much (esp. indoors). This is New Jersey we're talking about, it simply doesn't get that humid there at this time of the year.



Ok, with this person I prefer to talk numbers

NJ, October 2009:

Highest temperature: 79F
Humidity: 87%

All taken from:

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KNJSOMER15&day=31&year=2009&month=10&graphspan=month


That was the highpoint for the month! The low was 20% & the average 50.2 %. I think you are worrying unnecessarily.



I don't think you are getting this page information correctly, it is also saying Low -49.5 °F for temperature. I don't recall this temperature this year. What you saw is historical, probably in 100 years old period or something.


No mate, I'm quoting the monthly info. for October 2009. Honestly, I think you can relax, your lenses aren't in imminent danger of fungus attacks.



Who said I am not relaxed? I am not getting point of your arguments, that is the main problem.


The gist is: you are not in a high humidity area, your lenses aren't likely to be invaded by fungus.



It is relative to 100 or 500 years period but not to the climate shifts we are witnessing lately and I some provided facts to you. Besides it could be dry outside and humid inside, if you read this thread you will figure that many people concerning about same. My concern is more related to the cost of lens and no insurance coverage for mold damage.

Nov 02, 2009 at 10:00 PM
mark fadely
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #17 · Lens fangus protection


Breitling, I have seen humid indoor enviroments do a lot of damage. I think you are smart to be concerned. I am in the remodeling biz and have attended seminars on mold. The humidity level inside the home can vary quite a bit even within the same neighborhood. Factors like damp crawl spaces, ground moisture, and improper ventilation can all contribute to high indoor humidity levels. If your furnace has a humidifier on it you can turn that down or off. My home maintains a very low 38% humidity level, but if yours is above 60% then I would take action to lower it. Your de-humidifier will probably be all you need, but as I've found out - better safe than sorry.

Sometimes a home can be over-insulated which can spike the indoor humidy levels. Too much wall/attic insulation and tight-sealing windows are some common culprits.

Excessive condensation on the inside of your windows when it's cold outside is a red flag. You're probably getting scared over nothing because most homes are fine, but it is worth investigating with expensive lenses like your 500 sitting around.

Nov 02, 2009 at 10:07 PM
globalkiwi
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #18 · Lens fangus protection


I'm not sure where the 100-500 comes in, again, I was quoting figures from October 2009 - figures you linked me to! You don't live in a high humidity area & lens fungus isn't likely to be a real problem. New Jersey isn't the Phillipines.

But suit yourself. If it makes you feel better to spend money on a de-humidifer etc. - go for it!

(You seem to be resistant to hearing anything different anyway ).

Nov 02, 2009 at 10:10 PM
n0b0
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #19 · Lens fangus protection


Dehumidifier is expensive... and it uses up electricity. If you store all your gear in a cabinet, why don't you just put some moisture absober like Damprid in the cabinet and open the window a bit to let the air in?

http://www.damprid.com/index034c.html

Nov 02, 2009 at 10:30 PM
PetKal
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #20 · Lens fangus protection


Leonid, don't get carried away with your de-humidifier scheme either. There is a danger to excessive dryness too. For one, you might desiccate all rubber rings and gaskets on your lenses. Furthermore, lubricants in your 500, 300 etc. might dry out and/or solidify/gum-up way prematurely resulting in failures of moving parts like focusing assembly. Lastly, many interior lens components like glass and fluorite elements are set in and stabilized in situ using a plastic sealant (caulking). A very bad news if that starts to dry out.

Nov 02, 2009 at 10:32 PM
cgardner
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #21 · Lens fangus protection


Here's the ultimate solution, the Acme Shooting Sphere. Hermetically sealed, environmentally controlled:



This image is copyrighted by the owner






Nov 02, 2009 at 10:43 PM
PetKal
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #22 · Lens fangus protection


cgardner wrote:
Here's the ultimate solution, the Acme Shooting Sphere. Hermetically sealed, environmentally controlled:



Cool. Fill it with helium and get into aerial survey photography.


Nov 02, 2009 at 11:07 PM
MSC
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #23 · Lens fangus protection


Is fangus better or worse than fungus?

From the Urban Dictionary:

Fangus

1. A pungent, clumpy substance that looks and smells quite disgusting to the average westerner. Certain cultures consider it edible, but none find it appetizing. It is only eaten by outcasts or by those who have little else to eat. However, a few affluent people still eat it despite its nausea-inducing flavor, to the dismay of more civilized citizens.

2. A bizarre Indian delicacy quite unpopular in the United States. It is served chilled and can contain curry, potatoes, and/or [...deleted].

Nov 02, 2009 at 11:17 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #24 · Lens fangus protection


globalkiwi wrote:
I'm not sure where the 100-500 comes in, again, I was quoting figures from October 2009 - figures you linked me to! You don't live in a high humidity area & lens fungus isn't likely to be a real problem. New Jersey isn't the Phillipines.

But suit yourself. If it makes you feel better to spend money on a de-humidifer etc. - go for it!

(You seem to be resistant to hearing anything different anyway ).



I am resistant to the one who is arguing anywhere and anyplace without reason and facts. You or Vers etc on this forum are normally opposing any posts. So, what is new?

Nov 02, 2009 at 11:44 PM
Breitling65
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #25 · Lens fangus protection


PetKal wrote:
Leonid, don't get carried away with your de-humidifier scheme either. There is a danger to excessive dryness too. For one, you might desiccate all rubber rings and gaskets on your lenses. Furthermore, lubricants in your 500, 300 etc. might dry out and/or solidify/gum-up way prematurely resulting in failures of moving parts like focusing assembly. Lastly, many interior lens components like glass and fluorite elements are set in and stabilized in situ using a plastic sealant (caulking). A very bad news if that starts to dry out.


Correct, but that is covered by insurance or warranty ...

Nov 02, 2009 at 11:46 PM




FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Upload & Sell
1
2
3 4 end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost your password?