Marty Bingham Offline Image Upload: On
|
We have an "arrangement" with our local Parks and Recreation Department that allows us to shoot team and individual and action photos for a vendors fee. By developing relationships with coaches, team moms and parents we get about 80% of the T&I and 99.9% of the action. All is well. I would like to keep things just the way they are but I picked up the paper this morning to see that the park director has been dismissed. He was a key person in our agreement. Now that he is gone we will have to approach the new person when he/she is appointed and discuss our position. All this got me to thinking about contracts.
I am fairly confident I can pull off the first agreement unopposed but what concerns me is attracting attention when everything is up and running and put out for bid. Don't get me wrong, I'm not afraid of a little competition based on merit but bids attract sharks and amateurs, both of which are hard to beat.
The sharks come in and efficiently suck the money off the top and move on to the next one, not that there's anything wrong with that, but I can't compete with the high volume, nation wide model. The amateurs low ball the bid, lose their butts then fail to deliver and everybody loses.
So that leaves me wondering two things. First, should I keep things the way they are and hope no one gets any big ideas and beats me to the punch with a contract? Or two, go ahead and present a proposal, working with the county attorney and commissioners, that is heavy on action coverage, among other things, to make it difficult for the out of town big dogs and the local fly by nights to be competitive?
I would like to hear your thoughts on the situation.
Marty
|