skibum5 Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.4 #11 · New Canon 14-24L? interesting patent... | |
Dawei Ye wrote:
Jos Tesseract wrote:
You wouldn't [except in low-light conditions, shooting hand-held] but that doesn't mean Canon won't put it there. If it means they can make a couple hundred dollars more, using existing technology, why not?
I think Wide Angles are one class of lens that are really crying out for IS. Their very nature (to get wide encompassing scenes) means that you often have to stop them down to get DOF...meaning less light...meaning greater chance of motion blur. I think (and hope) it's only a matter of time.
Another class of lenses that need IS are things like the 24L, 35L, 85L, 135L. Those are really crying out for IS. The 85L and 135L are impaired in their low light function simply by the need to get high shutter speeds like 1/100
As identified though, there are some possible technical reasons why it is not feasible at this time to give them IS.
If we really are looking for lenses where IS is useless, I would daresay lenses like the 600L IS or 800L IS, which would be crazy to handhold...but that would be my ignorance speaking. Users of those lenses may very well utilise the IS in those lenses too!
Bring on (optional) Body IS 
most of those lenses would be hard to fit IS into
and hard to design well
|