lexvo wrote:
That refers to two long threads now discussing the organic (film-like) look of the 5D vs. the 'digital' look of the 5DII.....
EDIT: some others were quicker than me
All of that seems to be talk from non-film shooters who may not know a zipper from Zeiss! OR, think Kodachrome is the name of a National park in the US West ( it actually does exist!)
canonet wrote:
All of that seems to be talk from non-film shooters who may not know a zipper from Zeiss! OR, think Kodachrome is the name of a National park in the US West ( it actually does exist!)
Ian.Dobinson wrote:
Your target is to shoot stuff that moves. on your budget you have a choice of 1D or 2nd hand rebels 20D or possibly a 30D.
What will be the better image , the In Focus 4mp or the out of focus 8mp+ file?
Your other choice would be a used 40D, and the outcome to evaluate would be more like 99 In Focus 4 MP images or 80 In Focus 10 MP images. Out of the 99 4MP images, half of them would also be more noisy than the 10 MP images.
lexvo wrote:
That refers to two long threads now discussing the organic (film-like) look of the 5D vs. the 'digital' look of the 5DII.....
EDIT: some others were quicker than me
All joking and references to those other threads aside, I think I would pick my old 1D files as being the most "film-like" (as in very fine grain, moderately-contrasty, moderately-saturated Fujichrome daylight color transparency film exposed in good light and processed at normal ISO) out of all the DSLR's I've used.
