johnahill Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #12 · Sigma 50f1.4 or 50f.14 ze | |
philber wrote:
trajan wrote:
I have both, and use the for different purposes. They really complement each other.
--trajan
+1
My thoughts exactly. If you want to do many portraits, and love the isolation that wide open aperture gives you, and creamy bokeh, then the sigma is the obvious choice.
For landscape, cityscape, for colours and 3D, the Zeiss rules.
Conversely, the Sigma is weakest in quality control (there are just too many reports of bad copies, though that seems to have died down somewhat recently), in AF accuracy (not unimportant when shooting wide open), and a slight colour cast.
The ZE on the other hand is definitely soft wide open, and not supremely happy at minimum focusing distance, so you can imagine if you combine both.
But a good Sigma pic and a good ZE pic, both within their zone of excellence will leave the Canon EF 50mm f:1.4 into the dust.
Hope this helps.
I've got a similar set-up too but with a 50/2 summicron instead of the Zeiss.
With the Sigma AF, I've recently started using it on a 50D and found that for the close distance where the Sigma is best, I've programmed the Micro Lens adjustment. This really helps nail the shot when close-up using thin DOF.
Unfortunately my FF kit is 5D1 so it doesn't have the adjust feature
|