Paul Buff Offline Account Locked
|
p.1 #24 · Radiopopper JrX and Vagabond II problems | |
kenyee wrote:
Paul Buff wrote:
Technically, the differential op amps that form the analog remote input latch up when the remote is connected via the telephone jack and the AC power drops below a critical voltage.
...
And, Oh, the you tube link comparison sort of implies that I am a slippery salesman that cheats people - that where the "evil" statement originates.
Thanks for the technical background on the issue. I appreciate it.
That makes sense...so the remote power control interface basically "crashes" (digital term, but that's effectively what the opamps are doing when they latch up...hadn't heard that term since my electronics class eons ago )
I guess next question is whether there are better compatible opamps w/ smaller latchup voltages that can replace the current ones on the remote input port? If so, some of us would be more than happy to hack our bees for this feature if we could get a few unofficial hints . Opamps are usually big enough that desoldering/soldering a replacement isn't a big deal unlike the surface mount stuff that is more prevalent nowadays...
I didn't even bother viewing that youtube vid earlier. I just read it as companies pushing stuff out with "features"...but just about everything does nowadays. Look at Nikon's shutter failures w/ the early D700...or Canon's white pixel issue w/ the 5DmkII...or Tamron/Sigma's lack of QC...and I won't even get into software. Everything just is more complicated now and it's hard to test all the cases so you inevitably find "quirks" in the field 
Good observations. Technically, certain op amps and circuits object when input voltages exceed their power supply voltage. In this case, the power supply voltage dips under critical voltage from the Vagabond and the output from CSRs, RR1s, RC1s and RP controllers doesn't drop, so a latchup condition can result. This is something we didn't anticipate in 1986 when these circuits were designed before current limiting inverters existed.
As for hacks - while this is possible, these circuits, for the past eight years or so, utilize robotically assembled surface mount chips about the size of a flea. Field reworking of SMT circuits is extremely difficult for even very advanced technicians. From our perspective, yes, we could find solutions for this, but considering there are over a half million lights that have been in the field as long as 13 years, attempting to retrofit these lights would be an impossible task. It's tantamount to to trying to retrofit all pcs ever made because they don't have USB2. In that regard, how many 1986 (or 2005) vintage computers are capable of running 2009 software or hardware? This is not intended as a cop out. We are proud of the huge number of Buff lights in regular use today and which are fully capable of accepting all 2009 accessories, and capable of complete digital wireless remote control and operation with Vagabond and other inverters. The fact that RP was able to do what they have is testament. So the question arises: "Why didn't RP make power control of any light system other than Buff a feature?" Why doesn't XYZ flash have a Vagabond and digital remote for their classic products?"
As stated, this potential has existed since the introduction of Vagabond in 1998 and has not surfaced until this thread, either on forums or in our tech department. So Paul Buff isn't God!
|