Yakim Peled Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.3 #23 · EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS master thread | |
nads wrote:
Daan B wrote:
catfriend wrote:
If one owns the 17-55 2.8 (as I do), you might gain some range, but you lose the 2.8 constant aperture, and that's not a tradeoff worth making.
Hah, now crop users also have their 24-70L vs 24-105L dilemma 
Unfortunately that isn't quite true. We have a 28-90 2.8 vs. 24-135 3.5-5.6 dilemma. Do I give up some key wide angle coverage and still shell out 1K, or do I spend only slightly less for the extra coverage without any speed?
Neither choice is quite good enough.
I'll take speed over range any time. Actually, I did just that replacing 24-105 for 17-55. Also remember that keeping the speed and prolonging the range results in a lens which is both heavier and more expensive, prices not all are willing to take.
Happy shooting,
Yakim.
|