Fred Relaix Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
cputeq wrote:
I posted these in Nature, but figured I'd share them in the 7D forum.
I rented the 7D and the 400 f/5.6L for a week to see if I really wanted to switch back to canon or not (for the 400L, not really for the 7D)
I really, really like the combo to be sure, and my lens might need some MA (as many of my shots were *just* OOF - perhaps because I'm not sure a release on my tripod or other technique flaw of mine), but overall I really like how it feels. Very fast to focus lens. Focusing system is about where the D300 sits, meaning pretty darn good.
I must say - I prefer the look of the noise of the 7D over the D300 - It's finer grain-like, whereas my D300 (even with zero NR), just looks more mottled. Makes a difference when you start cropping pretty heavily. Oh, and with 18MP, cropping seems to go on forever.
The French magazine Chasseur d'Image posted a 10 pages analysis of 7D vs D300s. They are very very similar on many levels, however the 7D has the edge on IQ (more details with the 18MP vs 12, but also -surprinsingly- better high iso - analyzed on A2 size prints, with a less agressive noise suppression on the 7D that leads to more noise but also retain more details). However the D300s has still the edge on the AF and 3D tracking. The 400/5.6 however has nothing to compare at that price in the Nikon line-up (but I would be surprised if Nikon does not release a VR version at some point). If you ask the Nikon folks on the Nikon forums they will tell you that the D400 is coming, Canon camera do not focus and the D300s is still the best camera in its class. Good luck with you decision!
|