brainiac Offline Dedicated FM Account Locked
|
trumpet_guy wrote:
Cableaddict is referring to this set of test images on my pbase site:
http://www.pbase.com/tswen/nk28cz28
Be sure to view the original (100%) files.
Tim, I'm grateful to you for sharing your test, but I haven't found it very illuminating. I started with the f2.8 shot. The building shows far more crisp detail on the Zeiss. They are both shoddy towards the corners, and greatly inferior to the Leica in that regard. Perhaps the Nikkor holds detail a little farther out towards the edge. All of this can be found at http://www.16-9.net/lens_tests/28mm_3.html .
Your test is done on a 5D, apparently, so the tests have not been focussed with Liveview, and it's hard to say if the two shots are focussed to the same distance. If you're discussing adaptor thickness affecting your infinite focus, then you don't have a reliable way of focussing on your subject, and it's hard to say what the tests show. Also the Nikon shots are brighter, and that can dramatically affect colour rendition.
I don't see anything in your test that isn't at least as reliably shown at the 16-9.net page. The crispy micro-contrast of the Zeiss is one of the reasons people love it. As Mark says, You can always add more sharpening to catch up though, but surely it's better to get the detail without sharpening.
I would be interested to see these two lenses tested on 5D2 or 1Ds3 with Liveview focussing. I think the superb sharpness of the Zeiss might open up clear water between these two lenses at higher resolutions.
|