Carl Feather Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.4 #11 · Will you upgrade to the new 70-200vr when and if it comes out? | |
I've see-sawed on this for the past month. Ordered one from Amazon, cancelled. Ordered one from my local shop, but I'm not going to take it when it arrives. Here's why:
My gear: D700 and D300. The 70-200 stays on the D300 for most outdoor work. The D700 gets the 24-70.
Eventually for weddings I'd like to do two D700s, one with a 35 f/1.4 and the other with my 85 f/1.4. Minimal flash. Just those two lenses. I'm getting old and need to cut back. On an outdoor wedding, I'd add the 70-200, but on a D300.
So I'd rather save the money I don't have for a 35 f/1.4 that Nikon doesn't have (AFS, I mean).
I also have a 105 f/2.8 Micro. It's great on the D700. For landscape work, I have the 180 f/2.8. It is so sloooow to focus, but the quality is tremendous, better than the 70-200.
The nano coat, the extra ED elements and VR II tempt me. But I know this lens would not make me any more money. It would not pay for itself. My clients, who buy mostly 4X6 prints, would not know any difference. And since I use the lens mostly for portraits when its on the D700, it really helps to have the slight vignette and softness in the corners, although frankly, I'm not seeing it.
As long as I stay away from the forums where glowing superlatives are used to describe buyers' experience with the new model, I'll be O.K.
|