Eric Gottesman wrote:
85L
50L is my second guess.
-Eric
Just for the sake of it I'll second Eric's guess. I don't know all the Canon glass after all - - though for everyone's sake I hope it's with a 180mm or such lens.
On the one hand, California Quail are notoriously skittish birds. On the other hand Tony uses a hid from time to time has has a magical knack for getting close. Add to that the fact that he's posed the question, Im going to guess short, but not 50mm. I'll go for 200mm.
Probably a little difficult to get that kind of bokeh with a 50 or 85 unless the bg was very far away. I'll go with a 180 macro or the 200, anything longer would make the thread title less effective.
It displays well your ability to manually focus on a difficult subject. I have used the same stacking with the same lens, but not a Tamron extender. Maybe it is time to "upgrade" from Canon accessories.
wing tong wrote:
Probably a little difficult to get that kind of bokeh with a 50 or 85 unless the bg was very far away. I'll go with a 180 macro or the 200, anything longer would make the thread title less effective.
...unless of course it's at the other extreme like 400x1.4x2.0x1.6crop=1792mm
