l.g.c. Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #3 · Walk Around Lens and Upgrade to Canon 75-300 | |
I suspect your problems with the 75-300 come from a combination of the fact that the lens is reported to be ( I don't own one) soft at the long end, and the slow shutter speeds resulting from the small aperture at the long end. It is, I'm afraid, a cheap lens that has flaws and weaknesses. You are dealing with them.
My advice is that there is only one solution to poor quality lenses, and that is good quality lenses. Unfortunately, good lenses are expensive. There are some not-so-expensive lenses that apparently work well, but you need to pay attention to identify them. The Canon 55-250 seems to have a good reputation (I don't own one either) and is not too costly.
One way to get quite good lenses for cheaper prices is to cherry pick from the third party manufacturers. You do not have to use Canon lenses, and can be much better off using good third party glass rather than cheap Canon lenses. Example: the Tamron 28-75 f2.8 is a very good lens for a very good price. There are others from Tamron, Sigma, and Tokina that are not "quite" as good as the top Canon lenses, but will offer speed and image quality that is very good without the extravagant prices of Canon L's. Perhaps one of the very best buys in Canon L lens quality is the 70-200 F4 that you mention. Test it well and you would see immediately what you gain by spending that money.
|