JimU Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #1 · Leica 50mm ƒ/1.4 Summilux-R vs Leica 50mm ƒ/2.0 Summicron-R | |
I took arrival of my Leica 50mm ƒ/2.0 Summicron-R and was curious to see the differences between that and my friend's Leica 50mm ƒ/1.4 Summilux-R. I'm about to convert mine to Sony Alpha mount, my friend uses his on Canon EOS. I'd thought I'd share my thoughts.
The Summicron is noticably shorter and lighter.


Here's some initial test shots on his Canon EOS 5D Mk I
1) Summilux, 0.05sec ƒ/1.4

2) Summilux, 0.077sec ƒ/2.0

3) Summilux, 0.125sec ƒ/2.8

4) Summilux, 0.25sec ƒ/4.0

5) Summilux, 0.4sec ƒ/5.6

6) Summilux, 0.8sec ƒ/8.0

7) Summicron, 0.1sec ƒ/2.0

8) Summicron, 0.125sec ƒ/2.8

9) Summicron, 0.25sec ƒ/4.0

10) Summicron, 0.4sec ƒ/5.6

11) Summicron, 0.8sec ƒ/8.0

I decided to try to convert a Leica myself for my Sony á900 when I found a liking to the way Leica Noctilux shots turned out on the Flickr Noctilux pool. My intention was to use an m42-alpha adapter as a mount swap just like how I converted my 58/1.2 rokkor. I ended up buying a Leitax adapter which i will be installing this weekend. I didn't feel confortable experimenting with a $700 summilux so I opted for a summicron.
I scoured the interweb for differences between the '50 'lux & 'cron. It seems like hardly anyone has had both. 'Cron owners tend to claim the 'Cron out performs the 'lux in terms of sharpness wide open (no surprise) and bokeh quality. I kinda found the second one questionable.
This is a very quick comparison, tripod, 2 second MLU in my friends kitchen, but I don't really see much of a difference between the two lenses except for 1 stop and about $500 difference. Makes me want to do a few more tests before I perform the conversion.
any thoughts?
|