17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews

FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell	Search Used
1 2 3 4 end

Archive 2009 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

alvit
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #1 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

WOW WOW WOW

"Two stitched horizontal shots from the 17 TS-E at maximum shift."

Can you tel us (little guys) more!

Jul 04, 2009 at 10:58 PM

laupi
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #2 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

coooool

Jul 05, 2009 at 08:11 AM

Pixel Perfect
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #3 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Looks a bit soft and mooshy; Canon can't make UWA lenses so stop trying to fool us Doug.

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jul 05, 2009 at 09:38 AM

Dawei Ye
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #4 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Am I missing something? Looks a bit smeary towards the edges? No better than the 14 f/2.8L II I purchased and that is lambasted compared to the Nikon 14-24

On the other hand lenses like the 35L are truly sharp at those apertures

Jul 05, 2009 at 09:46 AM

roli_bark
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #5 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Will another "WOW" make a difference ?
Is there an on-line tutorial on principals and use of this type of lens ?

[ starting saving my pennies ...

]

Jul 05, 2009 at 10:04 AM

Chez Wimpy
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #6 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Dawei Ye wrote:
Am I missing something? Looks a bit smeary towards the edges? No better than the 14 f/2.8L II I purchased and that is lambasted compared to the Nikon 14-24

The stitched image (first one posted) has a FOV equivalent to a 10mm lens on FF, and it is a full 40MP+ resolution. Other than the fact it takes two exposures, this is medium format IQ territory... Canon clearly did their homework. Now all we need is a 50MP+ FF sensor to see the real limits of these modern designs.

Jul 05, 2009 at 11:02 AM

Doug Ball
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #7 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Certainly these new designs, with the new 24mll have enough fuel in the tank to deal with larger sensor sizes.
However it may be difficult to achieve 50MP + sensors within the 35mm format.
Something else may be in the wind.
I have felt that these new TS-E lens, the 17 and 24 might be the core of yet another new camera from Canon, much like the Leica S2. The S2 required a whole new generation of lenses to deal with the larger sensor, (medium format in size).
The new TS-E designs might morph into simple non shifting lens for a much larger sensor based body.
Canon must certainly be looking over their shoulder at the new Leica model which promises to be a real hum-dinger of a camera. With the larger image circle of the 17 and 24 designs you have a medium format lens in waiting. Couple this with probably a new 45 TS-E and an already excellent 90 TS-E you have a reasonably good start collection of lenses almost as complete as what the S2 will offer.
Does any of this make sense to anyone?
This could get exciting.

Jul 05, 2009 at 01:43 PM

Pixel Perfect
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #8 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Doug Ball wrote:
Certainly these new designs, with the new 24mll have enough fuel in the tank to deal with larger sensor sizes.
However it may be difficult to achieve 50MP + sensors within the 35mm format.
Something else may be in the wind.
I have felt that these new TS-E lens, the 17 and 24 might be the core of yet another new camera from Canon, much like the Leica S2. The S2 required a whole new generation of lenses to deal with the larger sensor, (medium format in size).
The new TS-E designs might morph into simple non shifting lens for a much larger sensor based body.
Canon must certainly be looking over their shoulder at the new Leica model which promises to be a real hum-dinger of a camera. With the larger image circle of the 17 and 24 designs you have a medium format lens in waiting. Couple this with probably a new 45 TS-E and an already excellent 90 TS-E you have a reasonably good start collection of lenses almost as complete as what the S2 will offer.
Does any of this make sense to anyone?
This could get exciting.

But these existing lenses would still be useless as the mount would have to be a new larger mount if they move to a larger sensor.

Jul 05, 2009 at 02:17 PM

Jman13
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #9 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

I don't think Canon is worried about the new Leica. That's not Canon's market. They've never been in the medium format business, and there's no need to start now. The Leica stuff is so ungodly expensive, people who buy it weren't going to be buying Canon anyway, they would be using medium format digital backs right now.

They haven't announced a price yet, but I bet the camera body alone will cost $15,000 at least. The lenses will likely be at $2,500 for the cheapies, to $10K for some of the more expensive lenses. Heck, the M mount 50 /0.95 is 10K...and they don't even have a really exceptional body to put it on, digitally.

Jul 05, 2009 at 02:24 PM

Doug Ball
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #10 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

What I suggest would be a new camera body with a larger mount.
You are right about the Leica system price being very expensive and catering to a different market.
Howerver Canon and Nikon might begin to feel there is as limit to the resolution game within the 35mm format. Leica has demonstrated that they can cram a medium format sensor with the optics for the necessary viewfinder into a body that is roughly the size of a 1Ds body. Sure it requires a new mount and new lenses.
My point is that with the TS-E lenses they already have they might be part way there in as much as having a lens design that can be adapted easily and therefore reduce the R & D expense somewhat.
Because of their astronomical price Leica is not a direct competitor to Canon. Nikon and now Sony are. Canon has to try and anticipate what they are thinking and respond accordingly.
My main business is product development and I have learned to think like marketing, engineering and development people in a large company.
Thinking inside the box (35mm format) can be dangerous when a company (Leica) have moved outside that box and demonstrated to everyone that it is possible.
Product development is a lot like the game of chess. You seize the initiative forcing your opponent to play defensively and never let up.

Jul 05, 2009 at 03:44 PM

robstein
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #11 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Dark Slider wrote:
My wallet is hiding from me somewhere, quaking in fear.

Mine knows that feeling all too well. I wonder if B&H takes direct deposit?

op - Yeh, I guess it's passable with reasonable sharpness

Jul 05, 2009 at 04:21 PM

mMontag
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #12 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

I totally agree that the evolution & development is pointing towards larger sensors. The 35mm sensor will reach it's premium efficiency. Somewhere in the internet wind I had read that Nikon may be moving that way. Leica's astronomical prices are also a detriment to their company. Their market share is so small that the cost per item is very high. With a higher sales volume the cost per item comes down. I think the chess game for Canon is more like checkers. Their competitors make a few moves - then Canon jumps to the front of the line and says - "KING ME".

Jul 05, 2009 at 04:36 PM

dancam
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #13 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

The details and low distortion of the 17 ts-e are stunning. Beautiful shot as well. I wish I could try the new 24 and 17 TS-e's side by side. I had the TS-e 24 mk1 for a while and was happy with it. I ended up trading it for a TS-e 45 because it fit my needs better at the time. I am very curious about the new TS-e's though. Any shots at f/4? How does it compare to stoppped down?

Jul 05, 2009 at 04:51 PM

dancam
Offline
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #14 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

mMontag wrote:
......I think the chess game for Canon is more like checkers. Their competitors make a few moves - then Canon jumps to the front of the line and says - "KING ME".

I love my Canon gear

Nikon may have a few goodies on their bodies but, Canon glass is second to none!

Jul 05, 2009 at 04:56 PM

Paratima
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #15 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

*sigh* I am clearly going to have to sell some gear...

Jul 05, 2009 at 05:00 PM

rscheffler
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #16 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

mMontag wrote:
I totally agree that the evolution & development is pointing towards larger sensors. The 35mm sensor will reach it's premium efficiency. Somewhere in the internet wind I had read that Nikon may be moving that way. Leica's astronomical prices are also a detriment to their company. Their market share is so small that the cost per item is very high. With a higher sales volume the cost per item comes down. I think the chess game for Canon is more like checkers. Their competitors make a few moves - then Canon jumps to the front of the line and says - "KING ME".

If you look at the history of photography, the general trend has been the reduction of formats as technology evolved. 8x10 and larger > 4x5 > 6x6/7/8/4.5 > 35mm > APS > digital APS-C/H > 4/3 & micro 4/3...

Of course a lot of formats existed in harmony together for a long time, as each had an application, which I believe will continue to a reduced extent with digital.

What I see with these two Canon TS-E lenses, the new 24 1.4 II, etc. is a lens refresh for the coming 10 years of sensor improvements within the 35mm FF and APS-C/H formats. I feel Canon has more to gain by maintaining and improving an existing system (EOS) and tempting photographers to it from other formats (as they've already done) than to invent a new system/format that will to some extent split their high end users (though such a system could be downwards compatible with EOS..).

Leica has the S2 and there are the MF backs, which have increasingly specialized applications (a market that seems to be shrinking and merging). I don't see that as Canon's realm (or Nikon's). In the pro-photography end of the spectrum they've pursued those looking for a "good enough" solution in terms of image quality vs. the MF backs, in a system that offers a lot more flexibility over a broader range of applications.

Don't forget that a short while ago Canon announced research into a 50MP APS-H sensor. Given past advances in sensor and microchip technologies, there's bound to be breakthroughs in the near future that will wring even more out of existing sensor formats, and likely continue the historical trend in photography to even smaller formats.

Since Canon's focus traditionally has been more towards the consumer end, my expectation is their near term focus will be more along the lines of improved video/stills integration in a single device.

My 2¢

Ron

Jul 05, 2009 at 11:12 PM

Tom_W
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #17 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

rscheffler wrote:

If you look at the history of photography, the general trend has been the reduction of formats as technology evolved. 8x10 and larger > 4x5 > 6x6/7/8/4.5 > 35mm > APS > digital APS-C/H > 4/3 & micro 4/3...

Of course a lot of formats existed in harmony together for a long time, as each had an application, which I believe will continue to a reduced extent with digital.
...
Ron

Interesting point regarding the trend towards smaller. However, I think that for the serious film photographer, the trend stopped at the standard 35 mm size. I never owned or wanted an APS film camera, and I was quite happy to replace my APS-C body with the original 5D. Not that there is/was anything inherently wrong with the smaller format, but I still prefer the output of my 5D to what I got with my 10D, 30D, 40D, and various Rebels that I've owned.

Comparing the 40D to the 5D was interesting - while the 40D blew the 5D away in terms of features, it was still the 5D that I reached for when I wanted to actually shoot images. It was that little extra latitude, that little more DOF control, and that proverbial (some say "fictitious") extra "pop" that the 5D provided that made it a more attractive tool to me. Was it due to the format? I think it was, since none of my other APS-C bodies could quite do it.

Jul 05, 2009 at 11:34 PM

alvit
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #18 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Tom_W 100%

Jul 06, 2009 at 01:07 AM

rscheffler
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off

p.3 #19 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

Tom, I don't disagree with your points. Larger formats definitely have certain beneficial characteristics.

Would you buy a Canon MF system?

It's possible the trend with serious film photographers stopped at 35mm because of the limitations of the film itself and a reason a lot of commercial/editorial shooters worked with medium format. But a lot of those photographers have transitioned down to FF 35mm digital. Meanwhile the trend among most casual photographers is to APS-C digital SLRs or P&S cameras with much smaller sensors. That doesn't discount the benefits/advantages of larger formats, it just reflects the current reality.

The question for me is whether Canon has a need to participate in the specialized MF digital market. I don't see a logical reason for them, other than prestige, to do so when they're already so successful in pushing the boundaries with 35mm digital and, as mentioned, have attracted a lot of photographers who previously shot MF or even large format film. There is likely more money for Canon in aiming product at serious motion picture producers looking for 35mm FF video capture device at reasonable prices, kind of like what Canon did with MF shooters 5-7 years ago.

One could say that a 1DsIII or 5DII, combined with TS-E lenses and multiple shifted captures stitched in post production already equals the resolution of MF backs, as Doug with his opening post illustrated so dramatically. So in a way the mythical Canon MF system already exists.

Ron

Jul 06, 2009 at 04:41 AM

Pixel Perfect
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On

p.3 #20 · 17 TS-E; Detail intensive subject

rscheffler wrote:
Tom, I don't disagree with your points. Larger formats definitely have certain beneficial characteristics.

Would you buy a Canon MF system?

It's possible the trend with serious film photographers stopped at 35mm because of the limitations of the film itself and a reason a lot of commercial/editorial shooters worked with medium format. But a lot of those photographers have transitioned down to FF 35mm digital. Meanwhile the trend among most casual photographers is to APS-C digital SLRs or P&S cameras with much smaller sensors. That doesn't discount the benefits/advantages of larger formats, it just reflects the current reality.

The question for me is whether Canon has a need to participate in the specialized MF digital market. I don't see a logical reason for them, other than prestige, to do so when they're already so successful in pushing the boundaries with 35mm digital and, as mentioned, have attracted a lot of photographers who previously shot MF or even large format film. There is likely more money for Canon in aiming product at serious motion picture producers looking for 35mm FF video capture device at reasonable prices, kind of like what Canon did with MF shooters 5-7 years ago.

One could say that a 1DsIII or 5DII, combined with TS-E lenses and multiple shifted captures stitched in post production already equals the resolution of MF backs, as Doug with his opening post illustrated so dramatically. So in a way the mythical Canon MF system already exists.

Ron

Depending on price of the MF and glass, I would consider it for landscape work especially. It has been clearly demonstrated even a 16MP MF camera delivers better IQ than a D3x and 1Ds III and that includes resolution. Pushing the 35mm format too much further is a waste of time IMO. If you want 30MP+ I assume you want to make very large prints, yet all things being equal the quality of print will also improve the larger the format, as there's less enlargement needed.

I'd be leaving the pixel account alone on FF 35mm now we've reached 24.6MP, and concentrate on much more important things, like DR, true 14 bit, let alone 16 bit capture, moving away from Bayer, maybe removeable AA filters, better glass, better AF, better noise control.

Jul 06, 2009 at 06:25 AM

1 2 3 4 end
FM Forums \| Canon-mount SLRs \| Join Upload & Sell 1 2 3 4 end