StevenPA Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
p.1 #17 · Post your best Zeiss 28mm and wider - | |
Cableaddict wrote:
Has anyone directly compared the CY 28/2.8 to the Nikon Ai-s 28/2.8?
I haven't, but from the various pics I've seen online, my Nikon is equal to or possibly nicer than the Zeiss.
Pics, please.
Both are incredibly sharp, corner-to-corner, both have pretty low distortion, and both are slightly lacking in color saturation.
C/Y 28/2.8 center sharpness doesn't really change that much from wide open to stopped down, but the corners improve dramatically by f/8. Center sharpness is excellent, and corner sharpness is very good. The corners will show CA in high-contrast situations.
There is no way the C/Y 28/2.8 is lacking in colour saturation. I've owned a few copies of this lens (can't seem to get it out of my system), and it has the Zeiss colour signature all over it: inky blacks, excellent tonality, the images just pop.
Separate question: Alex mentions above a C/Y AE J 28/2.8. What is this? All I ever see are "T" versions. Different lens?
AE = mount construction
J = Made in Japan
T* = lens coating
C/Y lenses come in two basic flavours: AE and MM. You can use only Av and M modes with AE lenses, whereas you can use Av, Tv, M, and P modes with MM lenses. Of course this is only relevant if you're using a C/Y mount camera. The counterpart to "J" is "G", or Made in Germany. A given C/Y lens might be AEG, AEJ, MMG, or MMJ. I think that's all there is. I've only ever used MMJ lenses, and of course the famous Distagon 21/2.8 only ever came in MMJ.
Edited on Aug 10, 2009 at 06:27 AM · View previous versions
|