cogitech Offline Buy and Sell: On
|
p.3 #5 · Major 50mm and 58mm shootout 2! | |
JimBuchanan wrote:
I agree with all of this, but:
"Once you look at the ground in those shots, the conclusions become quite obvious."
I can't see the obvious, sorry. Spell it out for me.
Well, if it is obvious to me and not obvious to others, then it will merely be a point of disagreement.
But, for what it's worth, the sharpest part of the Rokkor sample is sharper than the sharpest parts of the Konica and the Noct samples. The Konica shows more macro-contrast, but the Rokkor resolves more fine detail. The Noct is at a disadvantage due to front-focusing, which pushes the plane of sharpest focus closer to the edge, but this also gives it a "bokeh advantage" due to closer focusing resulting in a more blurred background. The OM 50/1.2 looks softer and lower contrast initially, but if you pay attention only to the detail resolved on the sharpest part of the ground, you'll see that it is on par with the Rokkor, but the Rokkor has better bokeh (subjective). The FD 50L, like the Konica, has high macro-contrast which tends to make it look "sharper" but the fine detail is not quite there.
This is all from memory, due to the facts that:
a) The link to those test images has now been changed to a site called "radikal.ru" which my site filter is blocking due to potentially harmful content. It used to be at album.foto.ru, where all the rest of the samples are and which is not blocked.
b) The link in my post above, which used to be a link directly to the comparison shots, has been changed to a link to the first page of this thread. I did not change this myself, as you can see the post has not been edited. This is the sort of shit that happened on my forum before I finally decided to just shut it down.
|