Y_vdm
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
|
This one is better that the previous nude that you recently posted. It works for me and it is already at the level of good fine art nude photography (I'm not an expert, only an amateur).
Some considerations from my very own point of view :
As on the previous one, and perhaps more, the BW processing is great. Deap blacks, good greys details, ... woaww. I whish to have same results on my pictures.
At the first time the direction of her eyes is quite disturbing. But as your picture is well composed (some comments below we take more time to look, to "de-code" the composition, to understand. So looking on the water, we climb the waterfall and come back on the model ... I asked myself why ... and find that's because the vertical construction helped by the ligth rays ... and she's looking in the same axis that the rays ... so looking to the light source. So the eyes direction and the compo are OK.
About the pose. The arms and shoulders are symmetric. I preferred an arm trying to catch the light or the hand in the neck. The foot position is extremely good, in the direction of the falling water and so extending the body size in the picture, but the leg "breaks" the general feeling by the angle. I searched to find what other position should be ok in this case and I understand that there's a to be a leg to hide the private woman parts. If you have the opportunity to shoot on the same location, try to put the model more on the stoned step, downstairs, more "included in the water". So doing you will get an over-body-extension, empowering the eyes expression by the arced body. It's also a way to solve the "hide-those-private-parts" by water and to enhance the model breasts beauty.
Hope my comments helps.
|
