Alf Beharie Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #17 · Archived Modern Photography Lens tests | |
mawz wrote:
Ed Sawyer wrote:
I too was impressed by the test results on the Nikon 35 1.4 AIS. every other test of that I have seen has had only so-so results @ 1.4 and 2.0... but it looks like they either had a great copy or something! that is one I want to check out in person if I can find one reasonably priced... (e.g. say half or less than the canon EF 35 1.4).
The Nikon 200/2 was surprisingly not so hot in the tests, I thought... well, I guess compared to some others I will post soon. The Canon 300/2.8 FL-F SSC posted some amazing results, that might be worth seeking out for someone. Another nice lens was the Zuiko 180/2, I forget if it was better than the Nikon or not, will post it soon.
Paul I have the results of the FD 300/4 and 300/4L (they did them both back to back), I'll post those soon too. indeed that is a good lens by the numbers.
-Ed
Any Nikon 35/1.4 on the used market should be half the cost of a new 35/1.4 or less.
Well you would think so but it is'nt always the case...A brand new Nikon AF 35mm f2 can be bought for less than £200 but I paid £250 for a used 35mm f1.4 AI-S from a camera shop, and that was cheap...I knocked him down £25!...There are several Nikon 35mm f1.4's on ebay at the moment, most of them considerably older than my AI-S version and apart from a really tatty old N version with yellowed glass, they are all over £300.
Note the old Nikon 200/2 is not the same as the VR optically. It's the VR that's the more legendary of the two.
Actually I'd say the only Nikon 200mm lens that truely deserves to be called legendary is the Micro Nikkor 200mm f4 IF AI-S...Best macro lens I've ever come across.
|