gabimaster wrote:
So what exactly you want so bad in your 60D that is not found in the 50D?
If you had spent some time browsing this and other forums, you would know that many users would like to have the features of the D300 in the XXD line : pro-AF with improved tracking, weather sealing, high frame rate, custom auto-iso, etc, etc.
If people don't like posts speculating about future camera developments may I suggest they don't read them in the first place rather than getting all grumpy. This is a hardware forum after all.
50D replacement will most likely have a Pro-AF, other things I don't care. I was right when I said 5Dmk2 was gonna to be a 21 MP Dslr. Of course no one knows what the replacement will be called.
Probably whistling in the wind, but please... no more pixels. Stick with the current sensor density and refine the high ISO performance.
Video is a given, and I suppose there are operational things that could be improved, but really, the 50D is pretty amazing to shoot with compared to earlier models. But I recently looked at some of my old ISO 1600 20D RAW files, and there is a *lot* less chroma noise in them than in 50D files.
It would be great to obtain this same high ISO performance a 15Mp file.
I don't believe you. No camera can take good photos after its successor has been released, much less announced. This image is a fraud and must be from another body.
For a Utah ski trip last month, I was carrying a 50D (note camera bag) and gave my brother the "old" 40D ... and that seems to still work fine. Although there are plenty of better things to take pictures of than yours truly ... ;-)
You are my new god! Will you please run for president??
Don't do it Tomagado, it's a demotion. Somehow I think he want you to be a Pres. so he can ask for a bail out
BTW, I like mine 40D but 45D could be better...as a backup for my 5D:P
Tomagado wrote:
I just wish we'd all go blind for 5 minutes so we can appreciate what we have and STFU already about cameras.
well said. to many GEAR HEADS and not enough photographers. fricken cameras are like computers anymore. its all about light anyway so if you can do it with a 20d or a 50d who the heck cares,, only thing that really matters is whats on print anyway. CLIENTS REALLY DONT CARE if you have a 20d or a 1 ds mark111. GEAR HEADS do,,but not clients.
YOU GUYS THAT ARE OBSESSED WITH THE LATEST AND GREATEST TOYS ARE ONLY DRIVING UP THE PRICES. GET A DECENT CROP AND A FULL FRAME AND GO BE A PHOTOGRAPHER,,,,,,,,NOT A GEAR HEAD
Rockies Photo wrote:
I've stopped coming to the Canon Mount Forum, because of post' like these. Everybody is always bi*chin' about what should come out next, or the features of the current cameras' are not good enough to capture images. Blah Blah Blah..... Can't we just go back to the days of a body coming out every 3-5 years.
?
