Hersch Online Image Upload: On
|
p.1 #11 · 50D + 5D MarkII for the 1Ds MarkIII | |
wilrobking wrote:
The 5D Mark II has certainly caused a lot of buzz. There was a thread started about it at another site. I stated that the 50D-$1400 + 5D Mark II-$2700 = $4100 compared to the 1Ds Mark III-$7200.
Just to give you some insight. I currently own the 1Ds Mark III and the 1D Mark III. I shoot weddings, portraits, landscapes, and just got a gig to shoot college sports. The 1D Mark III is without a question my work horse for weddings and sports, with the 1Ds Mark III being the work horse for portraits, landscapes, and weddings too.
I need a second body for sports. I shot a college football game last Saturday with the 1D Mark III + 400mmL f/2.8 IS and the 1Ds Mark III + 70-200mmL f/2.8 IS. The 1Ds Mark III did a great job but lacked the fps. I know I get 5 fps but with the super large file size, I was getting 4 shots off and CF card's write buffer was filling up. (Sandisk Extreme III)
Also the 1Ds MIII only goes to ISO3200. I'm thinking the 50D with it's higher fps, higher ISO, 1.6 crop factor would be the better choice for sports.
We'll have to see how the 5D MII's image quality stacks up against the 1Ds MIII's image quality to make any judgements, but the 5D MII would probably make a nice FF replacement for the 1Ds MIII.
So, here's the scenario. Someone offered me $4500 for the 1Ds Mark III so I can buy the 50D and the 5D Mark II.
Thoughts, opinions, comments? Would you? Should I?
This switch would mean that you would have to have three different type batteies and chargers. One for the MkIII, one for the 50D and another for the 5D MkII.
Grant
|