Anon Moss Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.18 #7 · EF 24mm f/1.4L II master thread | |
Tom, please - "death knell", "inability to accept filters", "absolutely kills it for landscapers"...what's with the hyperbole?
As has been established, the 14-24G is a world class lens...and comparisons between it and the new Canon 24LII are inevitable and warranted. It remains to be seen how the new 24LII will stack up. I'm optimistic, and personally hope that the new 24LII will be a great lens as I am primarily a Canon shooter (I have owned the 24LI and currently own the 14-24G) and I would love to see Canon significantly improve the wide primes. I'm just curious about how the 24LII and the 14-24G will compare and am trying to be open-minded about their respective strengths and weaknesses.
Obviously, the 24LII is faster, it works natively on Canon bodies...it accepts filters easily, it autofocuses...and it will report full EXIF information - those are all nice and desirable features. It will likely be the best in class at 24mm for low-light work and where autofocus is needed.
The $64K question for me is...how sharp will it be across the lens into the edges and corners with the new hi rez bodies for critical applications?
Landscapers aren't the only shooters interested in these lenses, but since you bring landscapers up...which lens will have a clear advantage for them? The 24LII's speed is not needed. Manual focus isn't a deal-breaker with the 14-24G...especially now with the new high rez LCDs and the ability to achieve critical focus in LiveView. Landscapers HAVE been using filters with the 14-24G, such as with the LEE adapter - it's not elegant, but there are work-arounds...do a search on the topic. Lastly, the 14-24G is about the same $$ (even with the adapter cost figured in) and it also works VERY well at all its other focal lengths.
I think some methodical landscape and architectural shooters might prefer the 14-24G when you consider it's versatility. For convenience and low light people shooting...I would want the 24LII in my bag. Having both would be ideal for me - but pricey.
Cheers,
Scott
|