Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Reviews · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
FM Forums | Forum & miscellaneous | Join Image Upload
1
2 end
Go to previous topic Go to next topic
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #1 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


disturbing.
http://carlosmiller.com/2008/09/02/four-journalists-including-ap-photog-arrested-on-riot-charges-at-rnc/


Sep 03, 2008 at 09:04 AM
Mike Farren
Online
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #2 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


Even more disturbing was the SWAT raids earlier this week on folks who were planning to protest.

Sep 03, 2008 at 12:00 PM
jimo1015
Online
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #3 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


Most of these protestors travel from City to city staging these protest and often destroy
public property when doing so . I for one don't think my taxes should go towards replacing
these assets. Too bad these protest don't stay peaceful . How much sense does demonstating against war in a violent manner make. These are not your average peaceful citizens but typically some far left group who are against everything and normally don't hold down a job

jim

Sep 03, 2008 at 12:13 PM
rayross
Online
Image Upload: On
p.1 #4 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


These protesters threw bleach on a 78 year old Connecticut delegate and then took his credentals badge. The swat team moved in to protect him and the rest of the delagation and recover his credentals. Peace marchers??
Ray

Sep 03, 2008 at 12:52 PM
jcw1982
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #5 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


I saw some footage of the "protesters" breaking out store windows and vandalizing cars. I see nothing wrong with protesting and having your voice heard, but if they are going to cross the line I see nothing wrong with subduing this type of criminal behaviour.

Sep 03, 2008 at 03:08 PM
photonanax2
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #6 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


I'm going to go out an a limb and share my 2 cents.

I live in the Twin Cities area and I could care less about the RNC. What I do care about is the protesters and various groups that have taken up residence in the Twin Cities for the last few months planning their routes, wasting the courts time with their petty claims of injustice when they don't get their way, how they are going to disrupt the RNC and in general create absolute and utter havoc for those that make the Twin Cities our home. Then, when they break windows, cause damage and purposely cause potential harm to innocent people, they take the cowardly route when arrested and say they are part of the "Doe" family. I agree with jcw - I have nothing against speaking up for a cause, but do it without the violence and harm to innocent bystanders.

The Twin Cities is a wonderful place to live and I don't appreciate these activists making a bad name for my home or taking away from our valuable resources.

Photonana

Sep 03, 2008 at 03:28 PM
Mike Farren
Online
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #7 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


jimo1015 wrote:
Most of these protestors travel from City to city staging these protest and often destroy public property when doing so


"Most"?

I think that "most" of these protestors are peaceful protesters merely exercising their right to free speech. A right that is getting trampled all over.

Sep 03, 2008 at 03:31 PM
tomhh
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #8 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


Mike Farren wrote:
jimo1015 wrote:
Most of these protestors travel from City to city staging these protest and often destroy public property when doing so


"Most"?

I think that "most" of these protestors are peaceful protesters merely exercising their right to free speech. A right that is getting trampled all over.


If they would just use their right to free speech, no one would be complaining.
Unfortunately, they want to be disruptive and commit mayhem.
Sure, many are peaceful, but one bad apple...............

Sep 03, 2008 at 04:14 PM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #9 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


I agree the people who are doing vandalism should be arrested, and thrown in prison. thats not the issue. The police are arresting legetimate journalists and preemptively arresting people because they think they might do something.

and if you watch any of the videos of the protests it's not MOST, it's 1 in 500 maybe. There were 10000 protesters, most of who were peacful.

But again, you don't arrest journalists and photographers trying to cover the story.

Edited on Sep 03, 2008 at 05:48 PM


Sep 03, 2008 at 05:37 PM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #10 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


photonanax2 wrote:

The Twin Cities is a wonderful place to live and I don't appreciate these activists making a bad name for my home or taking away from our valuable resources.

Photonana


Then you are really gonna hate what happens next. New York has had to pay out millions in damages for arresting journalists, and there are quite an army of lawyers who are donating their time to handle the law suits against the police for this one. This is going to be a pretty expensive mistake.


Edited on Sep 03, 2008 at 05:51 PM


Sep 03, 2008 at 05:50 PM
nanscombe
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #11 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


tomhh wrote:If they would just use their right to free speech, no one would be complaining.
Unfortunately, they want to be disruptive and commit mayhem.
Sure, many are peaceful, but one bad apple...............


... don't spoil the whole bunch tom.

Sorry, couldn't help thinking of the Jackson 5 song at that point.

It would be a great shame if people came to view photographers in a similar way

"Sure, many want to take innocent pictures, but one bad apple ... We'll just have to stop all of them, to be on the safe side"

Unfortunately the world seems to be increasingly in the habit of tarring groups of people with the same brush for the sake of a few individuals.

Sep 03, 2008 at 06:50 PM
MSC
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #12 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


I don't see how anyone watching what that photographer did in the video can think anything other than she was wrong and she pushed past the line. As a person that has press creds (albeit local, also a long time NPPA member), to not arrest this woman would have been as foolish on the part of the police as she was...but far more danergous for everyone in that crowd. She was warned (as if someone needs warning) and ignored it, and the police simply took her to the back behind the control line for the arrest. She got in the way of police activity controlling the crowd, anyone behaving as she did would have been arrested. This is a saftey and crowd contol issue...it has nothing to do with being press or not. Having been in crowd situations like this, it is no fun and the police are doing a good job...as evidenced by many news clips all over network news. This in no way infringes on my rights as a press photographer.

Edited on Sep 03, 2008 at 07:24 PM


Sep 03, 2008 at 07:20 PM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #13 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


MSC wrote:
I don't see how anyone watching what that photographer did in the video can think anything other than she was wrong and she pushed past the line. As a person that has press creds (albeit local, also a long time NPPA member), to not arrest this woman would have been as foolish on the part of the police as she was...but far more danergous for everyone in that crowd. She was warned (as if someone needs warning) and ignored it, and the police simply took her to the back behind the control line for the arrest. She got in the way of police activity controlling the crowd, anyone behaving as she did would have been arrested. This is a saftey and crowd contol issue...it has nothing to do with being press or not. Having been in crowd situations like this, it is no fun and the police are doing a good job...as evidenced by many news clips all over network news. This in no way infringes on my rights as a press photographer.


The lady in the video wasn't the AP photographer, she is a nationally known journalist.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/amy-goodman-arr.html


The back story is that her producer and camerra operator got arrested while trying to film another incident. The cops surrounded them with some demonstrators, and the producer and the camera person tried to get back as the cops requested but were slammed to the ground and cuffed. The lady in the video was inside interviewing a delagate when this happened. the video, she approached the police asking to speak with the person in charge in order to get her people released and instead was arrested herself.

The AP photographer was simply in the crowd shooting photos and was rounded up with the rest of the of the crowd.


Sep 03, 2008 at 09:00 PM
MSC
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #14 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


watkinssr wrote:
MSC wrote:
I don't see how anyone watching what that photographer did in the video can think anything other than she was wrong and she pushed past the line. As a person that has press creds (albeit local, also a long time NPPA member), to not arrest this woman would have been as foolish on the part of the police as she was...but far more danergous for everyone in that crowd. She was warned (as if someone needs warning) and ignored it, and the police simply took her to the back behind the control line for the arrest. She got in the way of police activity controlling the crowd, anyone behaving as she did would have been arrested. This is a saftey and crowd contol issue...it has nothing to do with being press or not. Having been in crowd situations like this, it is no fun and the police are doing a good job...as evidenced by many news clips all over network news. This in no way infringes on my rights as a press photographer.


The lady in the video wasn't the AP photographer, she is a nationally known journalist.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/amy-goodman-arr.html


The back story is that her producer and camerra operator got arrested while trying to film another incident. The cops surrounded them with some demonstrators, and the producer and the camera person tried to get back as the cops requested but were slammed to the ground and cuffed. The lady in the video was inside interviewing a delagate when this happened. the video, she approached the police asking to speak with the person in charge in order to get her people released and instead was arrested herself.

The AP photographer was simply in the crowd shooting photos and was rounded up with the rest of the of the crowd.


It is a distinction without a difference. If they did nothing wrong, they will get off. I've been in these crowds when they get out of control...it is a very ugly side of humanity. 9 times out of 10 the cops are well within the boundries of thier training.

I saw what she did in the video and she was stupid. Her boss is not going to be happy with her behavior, which was foolish and made matters worse...and more expensive. And the only people that will be sympathic are those that find police an evil presence or those people that think having press creds means you can do what ever you want. The rest will see this with more clarity...yet another black mark on journalists.

What really gets me is foolish behavior like this trying to get a story or a better photo will make it HARDER for me to do my job next time out...not easier. These over-zelous jouranlists are hurting our reputation and give us a bad name. And in the future, it makes matters worse for the profession...although hard to see what is professional about this kind of behavior.


Edited on Sep 03, 2008 at 09:32 PM


Sep 03, 2008 at 09:24 PM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #15 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


MSC wrote:
watkinssr wrote:
MSC wrote:
I don't see how anyone watching what that photographer did in the video can think anything other than she was wrong and she pushed past the line. As a person that has press creds (albeit local, also a long time NPPA member), to not arrest this woman would have been as foolish on the part of the police as she was...but far more danergous for everyone in that crowd. She was warned (as if someone needs warning) and ignored it, and the police simply took her to the back behind the control line for the arrest. She got in the way of police activity controlling the crowd, anyone behaving as she did would have been arrested. This is a saftey and crowd contol issue...it has nothing to do with being press or not. Having been in crowd situations like this, it is no fun and the police are doing a good job...as evidenced by many news clips all over network news. This in no way infringes on my rights as a press photographer.


The lady in the video wasn't the AP photographer, she is a nationally known journalist.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/amy-goodman-arr.html


The back story is that her producer and camerra operator got arrested while trying to film another incident. The cops surrounded them with some demonstrators, and the producer and the camera person tried to get back as the cops requested but were slammed to the ground and cuffed. The lady in the video was inside interviewing a delagate when this happened. the video, she approached the police asking to speak with the person in charge in order to get her people released and instead was arrested herself.

The AP photographer was simply in the crowd shooting photos and was rounded up with the rest of the of the crowd.


It is a distinction without a difference. If they did nothing wrong, they will get off. I've been in these crowds when they get out of control...it is a very ugly side of humanity. 9 times out of 10 the cops are well within the boundries of thier training.

I saw what she did in the video and she was stupid. Her boss is not going to be happy with her behavior, which was foolish and made matters worse...and more expensive. And the only people that will be sympathic are those that find police an evil presence or those people that think having press creds means you can do what ever you want. The rest will see this with more clarity...yet another black mark on journalists.

What really gets me is foolish behavior like this trying to get a story or a better photo will make it HARDER for me to do my job next time out...not easier. These over-zelous jouranlists are hurting our reputation and give us a bad name. And in the future, it makes matters worse for the profession...although hard to see what is professional about this kind of behavior.

Well, I disagree. The journalists on her team were slammed to the ground, thei'r noses bloodied, and locked up. They have been released, but you cant undo the physical assault. her asking to speak to the person in charge did not warrant her arrest.

I'm sympathetic and I don't see the police as an evil presence, nor do I think that having a press card means you can do whatever you want. I think most of the time the police do a fine job but in this case they were out of control...not just what was on the video, but all the weekend preemptive raids and the arrests of other journalists.

I think a press card should let the cops know that your not one of the demonstrators and that they should leave you alone while you do your job as long as you don't interfere. By all accounts her crew and the AP photog were not interfering and were just there filming.

Sep 03, 2008 at 10:42 PM
MSC
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #16 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


watkinssr wrote:
MSC wrote:
watkinssr wrote:
MSC wrote:
I don't see how anyone watching what that photographer did in the video can think anything other than she was wrong and she pushed past the line. As a person that has press creds (albeit local, also a long time NPPA member), to not arrest this woman would have been as foolish on the part of the police as she was...but far more danergous for everyone in that crowd. She was warned (as if someone needs warning) and ignored it, and the police simply took her to the back behind the control line for the arrest. She got in the way of police activity controlling the crowd, anyone behaving as she did would have been arrested. This is a saftey and crowd contol issue...it has nothing to do with being press or not. Having been in crowd situations like this, it is no fun and the police are doing a good job...as evidenced by many news clips all over network news. This in no way infringes on my rights as a press photographer.


The lady in the video wasn't the AP photographer, she is a nationally known journalist.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/amy-goodman-arr.html


The back story is that her producer and camerra operator got arrested while trying to film another incident. The cops surrounded them with some demonstrators, and the producer and the camera person tried to get back as the cops requested but were slammed to the ground and cuffed. The lady in the video was inside interviewing a delagate when this happened. the video, she approached the police asking to speak with the person in charge in order to get her people released and instead was arrested herself.

The AP photographer was simply in the crowd shooting photos and was rounded up with the rest of the of the crowd.


It is a distinction without a difference. If they did nothing wrong, they will get off. I've been in these crowds when they get out of control...it is a very ugly side of humanity. 9 times out of 10 the cops are well within the boundries of thier training.

I saw what she did in the video and she was stupid. Her boss is not going to be happy with her behavior, which was foolish and made matters worse...and more expensive. And the only people that will be sympathic are those that find police an evil presence or those people that think having press creds means you can do what ever you want. The rest will see this with more clarity...yet another black mark on journalists.

What really gets me is foolish behavior like this trying to get a story or a better photo will make it HARDER for me to do my job next time out...not easier. These over-zelous jouranlists are hurting our reputation and give us a bad name. And in the future, it makes matters worse for the profession...although hard to see what is professional about this kind of behavior.

Well, I disagree. The journalists on her team were slammed to the ground, thei'r noses bloodied, and locked up. They have been released, but you cant undo the physical assault. her asking to speak to the person in charge did not warrant her arrest.

I'm sympathetic and I don't see the police as an evil presence, nor do I think that having a press card means you can do whatever you want. I think most of the time the police do a fine job but in this case they were out of control...not just what was on the video, but all the weekend preemptive raids and the arrests of other journalists.

I think a press card should let the cops know that your not one of the demonstrators and that they should leave you alone while you do your job as long as you don't interfere. By all accounts her crew and the AP photog were not interfering and were just there filming.


They were slammed into the ground and thier noses bloodied? Wow...of course they ere just standing there, and a bunch of cops rushed up to hurt them. Get real.

This is the kind of response the hurts journalism and shows a severe lack of real-life-in-the-trenches understanding and these actions affect my JOB, and the next guy's JOB, and all of us suffer. The police were hardly out of control as you say...just watch the video. What part of common sense are the armchair quarterbacks lacking...get out in the real world and then your opinion will have some bearing on what working press, and the morons among them, do.




Edited on Sep 03, 2008 at 10:59 PM


Sep 03, 2008 at 10:57 PM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #17 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


MSC wrote:
watkinssr wrote:
MSC wrote:
watkinssr wrote:
MSC wrote:
I don't see how anyone watching what that photographer did in the video can think anything other than she was wrong and she pushed past the line. As a person that has press creds (albeit local, also a long time NPPA member), to not arrest this woman would have been as foolish on the part of the police as she was...but far more danergous for everyone in that crowd. She was warned (as if someone needs warning) and ignored it, and the police simply took her to the back behind the control line for the arrest. She got in the way of police activity controlling the crowd, anyone behaving as she did would have been arrested. This is a saftey and crowd contol issue...it has nothing to do with being press or not. Having been in crowd situations like this, it is no fun and the police are doing a good job...as evidenced by many news clips all over network news. This in no way infringes on my rights as a press photographer.


The lady in the video wasn't the AP photographer, she is a nationally known journalist.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/09/amy-goodman-arr.html


The back story is that her producer and camerra operator got arrested while trying to film another incident. The cops surrounded them with some demonstrators, and the producer and the camera person tried to get back as the cops requested but were slammed to the ground and cuffed. The lady in the video was inside interviewing a delagate when this happened. the video, she approached the police asking to speak with the person in charge in order to get her people released and instead was arrested herself.

The AP photographer was simply in the crowd shooting photos and was rounded up with the rest of the of the crowd.


It is a distinction without a difference. If they did nothing wrong, they will get off. I've been in these crowds when they get out of control...it is a very ugly side of humanity. 9 times out of 10 the cops are well within the boundries of thier training.

I saw what she did in the video and she was stupid. Her boss is not going to be happy with her behavior, which was foolish and made matters worse...and more expensive. And the only people that will be sympathic are those that find police an evil presence or those people that think having press creds means you can do what ever you want. The rest will see this with more clarity...yet another black mark on journalists.

What really gets me is foolish behavior like this trying to get a story or a better photo will make it HARDER for me to do my job next time out...not easier. These over-zelous jouranlists are hurting our reputation and give us a bad name. And in the future, it makes matters worse for the profession...although hard to see what is professional about this kind of behavior.

Well, I disagree. The journalists on her team were slammed to the ground, thei'r noses bloodied, and locked up. They have been released, but you cant undo the physical assault. her asking to speak to the person in charge did not warrant her arrest.

I'm sympathetic and I don't see the police as an evil presence, nor do I think that having a press card means you can do whatever you want. I think most of the time the police do a fine job but in this case they were out of control...not just what was on the video, but all the weekend preemptive raids and the arrests of other journalists.

I think a press card should let the cops know that your not one of the demonstrators and that they should leave you alone while you do your job as long as you don't interfere. By all accounts her crew and the AP photog were not interfering and were just there filming.


They were slammed into the ground and thier noses bloodied? Wow...of course they ere just standing there, and a bunch of cops rushed up to hurt them. Get real.


Well, from what people who have seen the videos say, that is "real". They were filming a demonstration, the cops surrounded the demonstration, and as they were trying to ask the cops which way to go (they were completely surrounded at this point) they were slammed to the ground with the demonstrators and handcuffed. I'm sure the demonstrators were probably out of control, but someone wearing a press badge and holding a camera is pretty obviously not one of them. I'm sure the video will come out in the lawsuit...

I'm glad to see journalists being more aggressive for once. It's like our media has been in a coma for a while. Things like this need to brought to light. Anyway, the ACLU is on it, so I'm sure we will be hearing more info as this progresses.




Sep 03, 2008 at 11:50 PM
jcw1982
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #18 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


The "ACLU is on it"

Sep 03, 2008 at 11:53 PM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #19 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/protest/36615prs20080902.html


Sep 03, 2008 at 11:59 PM
jimo1015
Online
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #20 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


The ACLU is a horrendous organization and in my opinion are very leftist to the point of almost being anti-american in their behavior
jim

Sep 04, 2008 at 12:04 AM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #21 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


See, I see them as exactly the opposite. They are the most patriotic PRO America organization in existence. The fight every day to uphold the constitution, They fight against anti-American actions, such as violations of our constitutional rights to free press and free speech. As for leftist, well, they represent both right wing and left wing groups consistently.

Sep 04, 2008 at 12:12 AM
MSC
Offline
Image Upload: On
p.1 #22 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


jcw1982 wrote:
The "ACLU is on it"



Thought that said "...IN on it."

Well, we will disagree and that's OK. I just hope MOST journalists/photogs keep thier head and we are all better for that.

Sep 04, 2008 at 12:35 AM
jimo1015
Online
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #23 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


What I have seen the ACLU doing is defending murderers, rapist, people that want to burn the flag , etc. I can't understand how they are so concerned about people that have caused havoc in other peoples lives and should be punished severely.
They just don't seem to have any connection to the average law abiding citizen but seem more concerned about the rights of people that have destroyed other people
jim

Sep 04, 2008 at 12:58 AM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #24 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


MSC wrote:
jcw1982 wrote:
The "ACLU is on it"



Thought that said "...IN on it."

Well, we will disagree and that's OK. I just hope MOST journalists/photogs keep thier head and we are all better for that.

There's an old saying...if two people agree on everything, one of them isn't necesarry

Looks like more incidents are coming in
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080903/NEWS01/309030012



Sep 04, 2008 at 01:13 AM
watkinssr
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #25 · AP Photog arrested at RNC


jimo1015 wrote:
What I have seen the ACLU doing is defending murderers, rapist, people that want to burn the flag , etc. I can't understand how they are so concerned about people that have caused havoc in other peoples lives and should be punished severely.
They just don't seem to have any connection to the average law abiding citizen but seem more concerned about the rights of people that have destroyed other people
jim


they represent anyone and everyone who have had their rights violated. Yes, one of those rights is to burn the flag, even though I personally find flag burning offensive they don't pick and choose who's rights they defend, nor should they. If you don't fight oppression out there on the fringes, you wind up fighting it in your back yard.

. Some times those people are despicable but often they aren't. Here is a list of religious organizations, many right wing, that they have gone to bat for: I compiled this list because I kept hearing they were anti-Christian.

The ACLU of New Jersey (2006) filed a friend-of-the-court brief asking a federal court to uphold an elementary school student's right to sing "Awesome God" in a voluntary, after-school talent show for which students selected their own material.
http://www.aclu.org/ religion/schools/25799prs20060605.html

* The ACLU of Louisiana (2006) filed a lawsuit defending the free speech rights of a Christian who was protesting based on his religious beliefs. The man was chased away from the front of a Wal-Mart store where he was carrying a sign that read: "Christians: Wal-Mart Supports Gay Marriage and Gay Lifestyles. Don't Shop There."
http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/prot...rs20061027.html

The ACLU of Rhode Island (2006) filed an appeal in federal court on behalf of an inmate who was barred from preaching during Christian religious services, as he had done for the past seven years under the supervision and support of prison clergy. The prisoner, Wesley Spratt, believes his preaching is a calling from God. Prison officials cited vague and unsubstantiated security reasons for imposing the preaching ban on Mr. Spratt. The ACLU argued that the ban violates the religious freedom guaranteed to Mr. Spratt under federal law.
www.riaclu.org/20060111.html

* The ACLU of Georgia (2006) filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of the Tabernacle Community Baptist Church charging that the city of East Point, Georgia violated a federal religious discrimination law when it denied the church a zoning permit needed to establish its house of worship.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/discri...rs20060419.html

* The ACLU and its affiliates (1999-2006) have been instrumental supporters of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), which gives religious organizations added protections in erecting religious buildings and enhances the religious freedom rights of prisoners and other institutionalized persons. The ACLU worked with a broad coalition of organizations to secure the law's passage in 2000. After the law passed, the ACLU (2005) defended its constitutionality in a friend-of-the-court brief before the United States Supreme Court in a prisoner's religious freedom suit; and the ACLU of Virginia (2006) filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals defending the law against a constitutional challenge.
www.aclu.org/religion/frb/26018prs20060612.html
http://www.acluohio.org/issues/reli...erty/Cutter.htm


* The ACLU of Eastern Missouri (2006) filed a lawsuit on behalf of Shirley L. Phelps-Roper, a member of a controversial conservative Christian church, over a Missouri law that infringes on her rights to religious liberty and free speech. The lawsuit challenges Missouri laws banning protest or picketing "in front of or about" any location in which a funeral is being held or any funeral procession. The law was enacted to prevent members of Phelps-Roper's church from conducting their protests, which many find to be anti-gay and anti-American.
http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/prot...rs20060721.html

The ACLU of Pennsylvania (2005) (in conjunction with Americans United) won a federal court case on behalf of parents of public school children who objected to a school district's attempts to impose religious beliefs on their children. Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District. The court decided on Establishment Clause grounds that members of the school board had used the public schools to promote their particular religious belief under the name of "intelligent design." Although the case was decided on Establishment Clause grounds, several of the plaintiffs challenged the teaching of intelligent design in large part because it offended their deeply held Christian religious beliefs.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/intell...sign/index.html


The ACLU of Pennsylvania (2005) won a religious liberty battle against Turtle Creek Borough. The Borough had repeatedly denied an occupancy permit to a predominantly African-American church, Ekklesia, that had purchased a church building from a predominantly white parish. The case was settled.
www.aclupa.org/downloads/SpringDocket.PDF

The ACLU of Louisiana (2005) filed suit against the Department of Corrections on behalf of a Mormon inmate, Norman Sanders, who was denied access to religious texts, including The Book of Mormon, and Mormon religious services. "Mormons should receive the same accommodation of their beliefs as do individuals of other faiths," said Joe Cook, Executive Director, ACLU of Louisiana. "Fair and equal treatment means they deserve the right to a place to meet, have a minister and discuss their beliefs like other groups."
www.laaclu.org/SandersvCain
www.laaclu.org/News/2005/Aug26SandersvCain.htm

The ACLU of Michigan (2005) filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of Joseph Hanas, a Catholic, who was criminally punished for not completing a drug rehabilitation program run by a Pentecostal group. Part of the program required reading the Bible for seven hours a day, proclaiming one's salvation at the alter, and being tested on Pentecostal principles. Staff confiscated Mr. Hanas's rosary and told him Catholicism was witchcraft.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/govtfu...rs20051206.html

The ACLU of New Mexico (2005) joined forces with the American Family Association to succeed in freeing a preacher, Shawn Miller, from the Roosevelt County jail, where he was held for 109 days for street preaching. The ACLU became involved at the request of Miller's wife, Theresa.
www.aclu.org/religion/gen/19918prs20050804.html

The ACLU of Nevada (2005) defended the free exercise rights and free speech rights of evangelical Christians to preach on the sidewalks of the Strip in Las Vegas.
http://www.kvbc.com/Global/story.as...53&nav=15MVaB2T


* When a defamation lawsuit was brought to silence an evangelical scholar who monitored the fundraising practices of several ministries and their leaders, the ACLU of Southern California (2005) filed a lawsuit under California's anti-SLAPP statute to have the defamation suit thrown out.
www.aclu-sc.org/News/Releases/2005/101364/


The ACLU of Oregon (2005) filed suit on behalf of high school basketball players from an Adventist school against the Oregon School Activities Association, which administers competitive athletic and artistic competitions in Oregon high schools. The ACLU argued that the Adventist basketball players who had made it to the state tournament should not be required to play tournament games on Saturday, their Sabbath.
http://www.aclu-or.org/litigation/p...cademy/PAA.html

* With the help of the ACLU of Pennsylvania, Greater Pittsburgh Chapter (2004), the Church Army, an Episcopal social service group, was able to keep its program of feeding the homeless running. The ACLU convinced the County Health Department to reverse a decision that meals served to homeless people in a church must be cooked on the premises, as opposed to in individual homes. Had the decision not been reversed, the ministry would have been forced to cease the program.

* The ACLU of Pennsylvania (2004) settled a lawsuit on behalf of Second Baptist Church of Homestead, a predominantly African-American church that had been denied a zoning permit to operate in a church building purchased by a white congregation. The occupancy permit was awarded in 2002, and in 2004, the Borough of West Mifflin agreed to pay damages and compensate the church for its loses.
http://www.post-gazette.com/neigh_s...uitsouth2p2.asp
http://www.post-gazette.com/localne...6aclureg6p6.asp
www.post-gazette.com/pg/04111/303298.stm


* The ACLU of Virginia (2004) threatened to file suit against the Fredericksburg-Stafford Park Authority after it enacted an unconstitutional policy prohibiting religious activities in the park. The Park Manager had prohibited a minister from the Cornerstone Baptist Church from conducting baptisms in the park, but under pressure from the ACLU the park revoked the prohibition and allowed the minister to conduct the baptisms.
http://www.aclu.org/religion/discri...rs20040603.html

* The ACLU of Nebraska (2004) defended a Presbyterian church from forced eviction under the city of Lincoln's zoning laws. The ACLU of Nebraska also challenged Lincoln ordinances requiring religious organizations to meet safety standards not imposed on non-religious groups.
www.aclu.org/religion/frb/16347prs20040811.html

* The ACLU of Virginia (2004) told the city of Richmond that it would file suit unless Richmond officials reconsidered their decision to close a Sunday meal program for the homeless at a local church because of zoning violations. "[T]he right of a church to perform a core function of its religious mission," the ACLU wrote, "is protected by the free exercise clause of the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993."
web.archive.org/ web/20040229092223/http:/archive.aclu.org/news/w091196b.html

The ACLU of Nevada (2004) represented a Mormon high school student, Kim Jacobs, who school authorities suspended and then attempted to expel for not complying with the school dress code and wearing T-shirts with religious messages. Jacobs won a preliminary victory in court where the judge ruled the school could not expel her for not complying with the dress code.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/s.../517482854.html
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/s.../517853141.html

The ACLU of Washington (2004) reached a favorable settlement on behalf of Donald Ausderau, a Christian minister, who wanted to preach to the public and distribute leaflets on the sidewalks around a downtown bus station in Spokane, WA.
www.aclu-wa.org/detail.cfm?id=57

* The ACLU of Michigan (2004) represented Abby Moler, a student at Sterling Stevenson High School, whose yearbook entry, a Bible verse, was deleted because of its religious content. A settlement was reached under which the school placed a sticker with Moler's original entry in the yearbooks and agreed not to censor students' yearbook entries based on their religious or political viewpoints in the future.
www.aclu.org/religion/gen/16093prs20031222.html

The ACLU of Virginia (2004) interceded with local authorities on behalf of Baptist preachers who were refused permission to perform baptisms in the river in Falmouth Waterside Park in Stafford County.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...anguage=printer
http://www.aclu.org/ReligiousLibert...?ID=15897&c=141

The Indiana Civil Liberties Union (2004) filed suit against the city of Scottsburg for its repeated threats of arrest and/or citation against members of the Old Paths Baptist Church who held demonstrations regarding various subjects dealing with their religious beliefs.
http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/prot...rs20040716.html





Edited on Sep 04, 2008 at 01:19 AM


Sep 04, 2008 at 01:17 AM

FM Forums | Forum & miscellaneous | Join Image Upload
1
2 end
  Go to previous topic Go to next topic

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost password?