rscheffler Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
stanj wrote:
Emile Gregoire wrote:
Somehow I find that hard to believe; a 1D4 would be first in line I'd think, before a 1Ds4. Plus, Canon has proven to be quite conservative. Going with stated solution would be too drastic to contemplate... even though it would make me one happy camper.
True. But just imagine a 1D4 @ PMA, with a unified body - say 30MP and a 1.3x "high speed crop mode" @ 10 fps. I am obviously pulling these numbers out of my behind, but you get the idea.
That's actually what I was expecting the Mark III to be last year, but at around 20MP with a high speed crop mode, though in hindsight, it was too early for that to happen due to lack of competition. Thanks to the D3 and D700 bringing FF competition with downward price pressure and the soon to be announced Sony FF that will probably sell for around the D700's initial price, it might be about the only way for Canon to justify and maintain a $5K+ price point. If it's much higher than that though, it will be a tough sell for the phojo/sports guys where the Mark III is now $4100, unless the Mark III remains available to fill the $4K price point. A unified Mark IV at a hight price point might actually encourage a lot of D3 users to stay put due to the expensive prospect of switching (yet again for many). And the reality in the news/sports world is that 12MP is more than enough.
I don't think those 5DII specs are all that outrageous. Sure, compared to the D700 the resolution difference is extreme at that price point. But I don't believe the D700 is all that relevant, rather it's the Sony FF. As cool as the D700 is, it might soon appear quite antiquated against ~20MP competition. 12MP was a big deal in 2002 (OK, the 1Ds was 11MP, close enough) or even 2005 with the 5D...
Ron
Edited on Aug 29, 2008 at 08:02 AM
|