patriot Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
ulrikft wrote:
timbop wrote:
All of that is pretty interesting, but the bigger picture is that those "specs" are made up nonsense from everybody's wishlist. You guys are setting yourselves up for disappointment, and thn you'll be mad about what the 5dm2 CAN do.
It won't have weathersealing, it won't have more than 4fps, it won't be cheap, and it won't have pro AF. Canon is going to prop up the 1dsm3 as long as possible, so you might as well get used to it and stop ratcheting up your expectations.
It will have great image quality at high ISO for about $3000.
Well, Canon WILL lose customers if they choose that strategy, I have patiently waited for a small form factor, pro body quality canon fullframe. I have so far waited with no luck, if they keep that "winning streak", I think I have to change sides, and I suspect many others will too. And that is sad :/ I love my alternative lenses on canon, my 24 1.4... but still..
We might get this ... but why do so many insist that it has to be a "5D MkII"? Wouldn't it make sense for Caon to replace the 5D, an entry level FF (FF in a 20D body) with another entry FF? Like a FF 50D? At an afordable price? Then, bring out a pro grade small body, like the the D700, for that smaller market? They'd be catching everyone with their pants down: no one has an entry level FF. AND a 21 mp "3D", with better IQ and high ISO performance compared to the D700 would be a winner there as well, especially if it used some variation of the AF in a 1 series cam.
|