stevenbernard Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.1 #9 · 50D is not a replacement for the 40D | |
I'm sorry but the 50D really is a replacement for the 40D, no matter what Canon may tell you. Yes, it's more expensive, but so what? New tech usually is. I paid about $1500 for my 40D a year ago with the kit lens. It's since been sold, but you can look at the 50D as a direct replacement since it costs about the same on day 1 as the 40D did ($100 more). That said, since the manufacturing costs for the 40D have doubtless dropped, it makes sense for Canon to sell it alongside the new 50D at least until stocks are depleted, if not beyond that.
Just my $0.02
That's my whole point, they aren't the same price. At least in the UK, the 40D came in at around £750 whereas the 50D is £1200, a whopping £450 or $850 more
Edited on Aug 26, 2008 at 04:24 PM
|