Jeff Offline Image Upload: On
|
p.4 #3 · 1Ds3 AF: learning to understand how it works | |
Daan B wrote:
Jeff wrote:
I'm not sure why a 'more advanced' AF system would require an edge to get accurate AF.
Probably because it has smaller AF sensors and reads contrast differently in comparison to xxD and xxxD series AF. Both smaller and bigger AF sensors each have their own advantages and disadvantages. In a way it is like comparing apples to oranges.
Anyway, since it is obvious that placing the AF sensor on top of the tree doesn't give a in-focus shot with a mkIII AF, it is better to aim for the edges. Wether we like it or not. This is how it seems to work the best (with proper working mkIII's) 
Where has Canon detailed the information of the 1D MkIII's AF sensors being smaller than those in the 5D? I don't remember seeing that in the White Paper. I think the 40D White Paper had a statement about reducing pixel pitch in relation to the 30D, IIRC.
What I do remember is the fact that the MkIII's AF sensor(s) cover a significantly larger portion of the viewfinder than the area that the little red square presents. In other words, the little red squares are not accurate, as many of us have found with many cameras. How the 5D fares here, I have no idea. I'd love to know just how large an area beyond the red square it is, and if it impinges upon the area of other adjacent (assist) AF points.
I'm no engineer, but it sure sounds like there were a lot of ways to screw this new AF system up, and apparently Canon secretly implemented one of them.
Edited on Aug 17, 2008 at 02:17 PM
|