Greg Feldman wrote:
Hey! What am I, one of the perverts from the People forum?
Yes--that was my point.
Come on, I qualified it! I qualified it!
Besides, she is very beautiful, what I assume would be lust-worthy. It wasn't an entirely unfair assumption, but I did leave ample room for your equal appreciation of the artistic merits.
An artist should be their own harshest critic... Nevertheless, it's still very interesting, and i'm not loathe to say that I rather like this shot. It's sweet and simple with a decent amount of blur. Makes me want to get a Zeiss 135 now... :P
Jos Tesseract wrote:
An artist should be their own harshest critic... Nevertheless, it's still very interesting, and i'm not loathe to say that I rather like this shot. It's sweet and simple with a decent amount of blur. Makes me want to get a Zeiss 135 now... :P
I think it has the most admirable blur of all the samples pertristis posted
The C/Y 135/2.8 is the only Zeiss that has bokeh that I like, in fact.
Pardon me for the gear whore shot, I was testing my EOS to MFT adapter and snapped a shot. It's 135L on the E-P1. I was somewhat surprised by the result. The white blur in front is actually a black lens blower. The pink blob I'm guessing it's a box with loads of junk on it, and more junk behind the box.
Navyblue wrote:
... The white blur in front is actually a black lens blower. The pink blob I'm guessing it's a box with loads of junk on it....
OMG, what kind of lens would render black to white... and the pink...what is that.. Your 135L must be broken - you need to send it to me for proper disposal.
