carpents Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.6 #7 · "Admirable" blur samples | |
Jonas B wrote:
Hi Sean,
Good to see you. Heh! You signed up and saw no reason to post until now?
The Nikon DC lenses aren't exactly alternatives but quite interesting. I wouldn't mind a couple at longer distances and perhaps with some blobs and highlights in the OOF background. Regards,
and Post 1 is updated
I suppose I haven't had much to say!
I've used the DC lenses with an adapter on my Pentax cameras, does that qualify them as 'alternative'? Unfortunately I don't think I have any of those shots easily available.
As for your other request, I think I can oblige. When you change the setting for blur it has an (unsurprising) effect on overall sharpness due to the change in spherical aberrations. So when I use it 'outside' I generally leave the Defocus ring at neutral, and the lens is still very good at that setting. Starting at f/2 you get a nice sharp plane of focus and smooth blur.
Nikon 105/2 DC @f/3.2, Defocus Control neutral:

But as you change the Defocus setting, you have to be aware of how soft your plane of focus becomes (not to mention that it messes with the focus for AF usage). At full Defocus, you really need f/3.5 or smaller to get a 'sharp' image. Between f/2.8 and f/3.5 there is some softening, and between f/2 and f/2.8 it is almost a soft-focus lens. Of course, you can play with the Defocus amount depending on what aperture you wanted.
I believe the shot below was taken at full Defocus (background optimization) with the aperture at f/2.8. The softness in the plane of focus is evident even at this smaller size. The background is a very busy one.
Nikon 105/2 DC @f/2.8, Defocus @maximum:

(I would probably stop down to f/3.5 on this one if I shot it again.)
|