PhotoMaximum Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
"Different strokes for different folks" as the saying goes. There are also a lot of lenses out there as well and you are well within your rights to express your disconnect with this lens. Part of the joy of photography is the incredible variation of tools, technique and the images produced.
I will say that your finding the Rokkor images "...something lacking or disturbing" is a bit strong though. Most of the 58/1.2 images posted here are shot wide open as the fast aperture and unique focal length is part of the attraction with this lens. Maybe thats it?
On the large format photgraphy boards you will see fans argue for the Shneider/Rodenstock/Nikon/Fuji lenses to no end. But does it really matter? For me I like the whole package when it comes to the Rokkor 58/1.2: the age, history, funky focal length, heft, feel and the image quality. I have the older metal style and it feels nice to play with. It gives an interesting "look" wide open and then produces another character stopped down. Its not so much a "wow" factor, rather the whole package is very appealing for me...
Of course your mileage may vary...
Another shot showing its different style:

PS: I also have the later Zuiko 50/1.8 and its a nice little lens. But its what I would expect from a name brand 50mm: good solid performer, but nothing really noticeable one way or the other...
|