Register · Search · Software · Join Upload & Sell · Hosting

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

FM Forum Rules
FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell   
Search Used
1   2   3      123  
124
   125      173   174   end
  

Archive 2008 · "Admirable" blur samples
  
 
cavewalker
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #1 · "Admirable" blur samples


Takumar SMC 1.4/50

This image is copyrighted by the owner


Dec 30, 2009 at 01:04 PM
rtallent
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #2 · "Admirable" blur samples


Hard to believe it was raining and 40 degrees F on 12/27 here (very unseasonably warm) and for the last day-and-a-half it's been about 8 degrees!

5D Mark II with EF 135L



This image is copyrighted by the owner




Dec 30, 2009 at 10:05 PM
Jonas B
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #3 · "Admirable" blur samples


rtallent wrote:
Hard to believe it was raining (...) 5D Mark II with EF 135L


I like that one a lot!

Dec 30, 2009 at 11:19 PM
rtallent
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #4 · "Admirable" blur samples


Jonas B wrote:
rtallent wrote:
Hard to believe it was raining (...) 5D Mark II with EF 135L


I like that one a lot!


Thanks, Jonas

Dec 31, 2009 at 12:38 AM
ulrikft2
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #5 · "Admirable" blur samples




This image is copyrighted by the owner





58 1.2

Jan 01, 2010 at 09:11 PM
Anden
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #6 · "Admirable" blur samples


ulrikft2 wrote:


This image is copyrighted by the owner





58 1.2


Superb!


Jan 01, 2010 at 09:49 PM
ulrikft2
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #7 · "Admirable" blur samples


thanks!

Jan 01, 2010 at 10:10 PM
U.C.
Online
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #8 · "Admirable" blur samples


5D-II with Rodenstock 42mm f/0.75 and a Christmas tree + some ornaments.

This image is copyrighted by the owner

This image is copyrighted by the owner

This image is copyrighted by the owner

Jan 10, 2010 at 01:39 AM
burningheart
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #9 · "Admirable" blur samples


Nice 0.75 , I like the 3rd one the most.

Jan 10, 2010 at 01:57 AM
kakomu
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #10 · "Admirable" blur samples


Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 @ f/1.8


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Nikon Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 Ai @ f/2.8 (I think)


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Nikon Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 Ai-s ED @ f/2.8:


This image is copyrighted by the owner




Edited on Jan 11, 2010 at 05:32 PM · View previous versions


Jan 10, 2010 at 03:05 AM
 



Bifurcator
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #11 · "Admirable" blur samples


Jonas B wrote:
This is a try to collect opinions on bokeh of all sorts (and also a try to save the Sigma 50 -thread from getting carried away). When I say bokeh of all sorts I mean it...


OK! Here's mine then:
These are all produced with the Knoica Minolta GT lens. I believe it's an achromat consisting of 16 elements in 13 groups, including two AD (anomalous dispersion) glass elements and two aspheric surfaces. It might actually classify as an Apochromatic design but I don't know the materials used (kind of glass) for the two AD elements so I guess I better not jump. It's 7.2mm ~ 50.8mm (f/2.3 ~ f3.2) which on a 2/3" sensor is the 35mm equivalent of 28mm ~ 200mm. It has a macro switch that can be positioned when at either end of it's focal length so there' a 160 ~ 200 zoomable macro at the top end and a fixed 28mm macro at the bottom end.

It's probably not important to this discussion but since the lens is not user replaceable it might be interesting to note that the auto-focus system is a "Video AF system," which uses phase-detection focusing technology rather than the much more common contrast-detection. This makes focus tracking with the system very very nice and speeds up AF in general. With this system the camera not only determines whether or not the lens is in focus, but also how far out of focus it is, and in which direction (near or far).

Subject Distances as specified (below) are measured from the sensor surface plane.


This image is copyrighted by the owner
01. EXIF: Macro, 1/15s f/3.5 ISO64 43.7mm (35mm eq:171mm), Subject Distance: 0.58 m


This image is copyrighted by the owner
02. EXIF: Macro, 1/2s f/3.5 ISO64 50.8mm (35mm eq:200mm), Subject Distance: 0.30 m


This image is copyrighted by the owner
03. EXIF not macro, 1/125s f/4.5 ISO64 46.96mm (35mm eq:184mm), Subject Distance: 2.40 m


This image is copyrighted by the owner
06. EXIF Macro, 1/200s f/3.5 ISO64 43.7mm (35mm eq:171mm), Subject Distance: 0.50 m


This image is copyrighted by the owner
10. EXIF Macro, 1/13s f/3.5 ISO64 50.8mm (35mm eq:200mm), Subject Distance: 0.40 m


This image is copyrighted by the owner
11. EXIF Macro, 1/15s f/3.5 ISO64 50.8mm (35mm eq:200mm), Subject Distance: 0.46 m


This image is copyrighted by the owner
12. EXIF Macro, 1/320s f/3.5 ISO64 43.44mm (35mm eq:170mm), Subject Distance: 0.32 m


This image is copyrighted by the owner
13. EXIF Macro, 1/10s f/3.5 ISO64 42.12mm (35mm eq:165mm), Subject Distance: 0.40 m




Act cleaned up.

I believe you can only get this lens by purchasing one of the cameras (DiMAGE 7D, A1, A2, and A200) built around it by the now defunct (out of the camera business) Minolta or Konica/Minolta companies. I think the A200 is still selling for about $450 (new) and all the others should be obtainable for under $200.


Edited on Feb 28, 2010 at 03:55 AM · View previous versions


Jan 11, 2010 at 09:22 AM
kakomu
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #12 · "Admirable" blur samples


Bifurcator wrote:
Can you tell which ones are the natural bokeh of the lens, which ones are rendered in software, and which ones are staged?

The point of the thread is to let everyone know where it came from...not to force them to guess.

Jan 11, 2010 at 12:57 PM
helimat
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #13 · "Admirable" blur samples


Uh oh... Macro shots. Jonas's head might explode...

Jan 11, 2010 at 03:28 PM
burningheart
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #14 · "Admirable" blur samples


kakomu wrote:
Bifurcator wrote:
Can you tell which ones are the natural bokeh of the lens, which ones are rendered in software, and which ones are staged?

The point of the thread is to let everyone know where it came from...not to force them to guess.


I thought it was also to show what a lens does bokeh wise, not what the computer can do bokeh wise.


Edited on Jan 11, 2010 at 07:03 PM · View previous versions


Jan 11, 2010 at 05:02 PM
RustyBug
Offline
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #15 · "Admirable" blur samples



I thought it was also to show what a lens does bokeh wise, not what the computer can do.


I misunderstood the intent of the thread originally also ... I posted several 'motion blur' pics ...



This image is copyrighted by the owner




... before I realized it was intended to be more of a 'bokeh' evaluation thread.

The poster will probably adapt accordingly ... as others have.


Jan 11, 2010 at 05:08 PM
Jonas B
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #16 · "Admirable" blur samples


Lol, what's going on here.... Don't people read all 100 pages before posting?!

helimat wrote:
Uh oh... Macro shots. Jonas's head might explode...


Heh. Yeah, or implode; I have decided not to become upset until the World Soccer Championships.

burningheart wrote:
I thought it was also to show what a lens does bokeh wise, not what the computer can do.


If possible. Sometimes we have to show off, it's part of being photographer I guess. There is a tendency, since long, to show spectacular images rather than clinical boring describing evaluative images. I try to act as a model...

Bifurcator, you're welcome. Our friends are thinking of my wish as expressed for example here.

Rustibug, that's a cute little image.

This image is copyrighted by the owner


Jan 11, 2010 at 06:53 PM
Makten
Offline
Upload & Sell: Off
p.124 #17 · "Admirable" blur samples


Leica Summicron-C 40/2 @ f/2 on M8



This image is copyrighted by the owner







This image is copyrighted by the owner





This lens is a bit wierd since the bokeh gets harsher at closer distances. The opposite is the most common.

Jan 11, 2010 at 09:04 PM
Jonas B
Offline
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #18 · "Admirable" blur samples


Makten wrote:
Leica Summicron-C 40/2 @ f/2 on M8(...)
This lens is a bit wierd since the bokeh gets harsher at closer distances. The opposite is the most common.


Ah, you never know with relative distances... "gets harsher"? Hmm, well, everyting isn't admirable.
I have a, to me new, Olympus Pen FT 42/1.2 sent for service and I'm looking forward to see how it renders OOF areas. I suspect it can look like your compact Summicron sometimes. It's very fun to play with these small old lenses!

Jan 11, 2010 at 10:13 PM
Bifurcator
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #19 · "Admirable" blur samples


Bifurcator wrote:
Can you tell which ones are the natural bokeh of the lens, which ones are rendered in software, and which ones are staged?


kakomu wrote:
The point of the thread is to let everyone know where it came from...not to force them to guess.


burningheart wrote:
I thought it was also to show what a lens does bokeh wise, not what the computer can do bokeh wise.



Oh, OK. So only real lenses and they should be named. OK, I'll straighten up my act.


helimat wrote:
Uh oh... Macro shots. Jonas's head might explode...


I hope his head will be OK. That sounds painful!


I straightened up my post above and added some information about the lens. Here's another shot with the same lens this time a distance shot taken about 4 to 5 meters from the focus point (subject).

This image is copyrighted by the owner
EXIF: Distant View, 1/200s f/4.0 ISO64 50.8mm (35mm eq:200mm), Subject Distance: Not Retained.





Jan 11, 2010 at 10:38 PM
Bifurcator
Online
Dedicated FM
Upload & Sell: On
p.124 #20 · "Admirable" blur samples


Jonas B wrote:
If possible. Sometimes we have to show off, it's part of being photographer I guess. There is a tendency, since long, to show spectacular images rather than clinical boring describing evaluative images. I try to act as a model...


Embarrassingly honest. Is that even allowed here? I like it!


Bifurcator, you're welcome. Our friends are thinking of my wish as expressed for example here.

Ah, way back on page 25. Yeah, sorry, I took all my direction from the initial post. Hehehe, It looks like I clobbered every one of your suggested revisions. Sorry about that. Oh well, it's all good... (I hope).


Jan 12, 2010 at 12:20 AM
1   2   3      123  
124
   125      173   174   end




FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1   2   3      123  
124
   125      173   174   end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost your password?