Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3      
4
       5              540       541       end
  

Post your recent film shots!
  
 
mrladewig
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #1 · p.4 #1 · Post your recent film shots!


I thought I'd bring this thread back from the dead.

Blue Lakes - Sneffels Wilderness, CO

Tachihara 45BR, Schneider Super Angulon 75/8, Fuji Provia, GND, 81B

Edited by mrladewig on Sep 05, 2008 at 10:21 PM GMT

Edited on Sep 06, 2008 at 05:21 AM



Sep 06, 2008 at 05:19 AM
mrladewig
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #2 · p.4 #2 · Post your recent film shots!


Teakettle Mountain and Yankee Boy Basin, Sneffels Range, CO


Tachihara 45BR, Fuji 125 -NW, Fuji Velvia 100, 3 HGND



Sep 06, 2008 at 05:21 AM
mrladewig
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #3 · p.4 #3 · Post your recent film shots!


American Basin, San Juan Mountains, CO


Tachihara 45BR, Fuji 125-NW, Fuji Astia, 81B



Sep 06, 2008 at 05:25 AM
mrladewig
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #4 · p.4 #4 · Post your recent film shots!


American Basin waterfalls

Canon EOS 300, Canon 50/1.4, CPL, Ilford XP2 Super rated at ISO 200

Sloan Lake above American Basin at 13,000 feet

Canon EOS 300, Canon 17-40L, CPL, Fuji Superia 100




Sep 06, 2008 at 05:49 AM
Daniel Buck
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #5 · p.4 #5 · Post your recent film shots!


alright! glad to see this thread pick back up again!

Edited on Sep 06, 2008 at 05:52 AM



Sep 06, 2008 at 05:52 AM
mh2000
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #6 · p.4 #6 · Post your recent film shots!


XP-2 Super is more grainy than BW400CN, but seems sharper. From my tests, XP-2 Super does much better at ISO 250-320 than at 400 whereas BW400CN does about perfect at 400. I use BW400CN now, especially after Ilford jacked up their prices to match Kodak... I guess in general I prefer Kodak b&w anyway, so now that Kodak is a little cheaper I just use them... good results can be had from either though...

Matt Cope wrote:
It is grainy (which is odd because a lot of people used to claim the chromogenic films were too fine grained to look right..) but noticably less so if you nail the exposure. A lot of my scans (like those posted) look grainier than they are because the scanning service I use tends to block up the grain a bit.. It's still worth it for me though because I can get it developed and scanned onto CD very easily and cheaply, and anything great I can replrint from the negative or get scanned properly..




Sep 06, 2008 at 05:59 AM
jkao0826
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #7 · p.4 #7 · Post your recent film shots!


Looks like fun:

Yashica FX-3 2000 on Kodak BW400CN

1. CZ 100/2


2. CZJ 35/2.4


3. CZ 100/2


4. CZ 100/2



Sep 07, 2008 at 11:19 AM
mawz
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #8 · p.4 #8 · Post your recent film shots!




Yashica FR, CZ 28-70/3.5-4.5, Superia 800



Yashica FR, CZ 28-70/3.5-4.5, Superia 400







Mamiya 645 Super, 150mm f3.5 C, Provia 400F



Sep 07, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Lotusm50
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #9 · p.4 #9 · Post your recent film shots!


mawz- How are you scanning these? They all seem to have a decidedly purple cast -- and I don't think that is due to the Fuji film.



Edited on Sep 07, 2008 at 01:25 PM



Sep 07, 2008 at 01:24 PM
mawz
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #10 · p.4 #10 · Post your recent film shots!


Lotusm50 wrote:
mawz- How are you scanning these? They all seem to have a decidedly purple cast -- and I don't think that is due to the Fuji film.



Scanned on a Epson 4870 and then corrected for a purple cast in post (the 4870 tends towards a purple cast by default).

I'm not seeing any purple cast in the posted images however, at least not in the first or third (there's a hint of it in the second that I couldn't erase entirely), across multiple systems (Either on my profiled editing system at home or my unprofiled work system which I'm using right now). Does your browser obey colour profiles? Those are sRGB images and I'm checking in Firefox 3 with profiles enabled.


Edited on Sep 07, 2008 at 02:15 PM



Sep 07, 2008 at 02:12 PM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



Lotusm50
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #11 · p.4 #11 · Post your recent film shots!


My monitor is fully profiled and I use Firefox 3 which is color managed. I'm not seeing the purple cast on anyone else's images, just the ones you posted above.




Sep 07, 2008 at 06:06 PM
pdmphoto
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.4 #12 · p.4 #12 · Post your recent film shots!


I'm not seeing the purple cast on my profiled monitor.


Sep 07, 2008 at 06:24 PM
mawz
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #13 · p.4 #13 · Post your recent film shots!


Lotusm50 wrote:
My monitor is fully profiled and I use Firefox 3 which is color managed. I'm not seeing the purple cast on anyone else's images, just the ones you posted above.



Note FF3 is not colour-managed by default, you do need to enable it.

I've also tested in IE6 on my work machine and see no colour cast (that's a completely unprofiled system).

The only thing I can think of is that your system is somehow misunderstanding the profile attached to those images (should be bog-standard sRGB assigned by PS CS2).


Edited on Sep 07, 2008 at 06:49 PM



Sep 07, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Lotusm50
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #14 · p.4 #14 · Post your recent film shots!


This is odd, because, as I said, I don't see the purple cast in any other images. I even downloaded the file and pulled it into CS3 and the cast is still there -- so it's not just the browser. Maybe it how we are defining "cast". It's not really evident in the first image of the sky and skyscraper, but in the 2nd and 3rd it is. The second also appears over contrasty and over saturated (the oranges and reds of the streetlight and car light, and green patina of the church steeple are very, very strong. In the last image, contrast is fine, but the silver car is slightly purplish, as is the concrete, gray building stone and gutter spout on the left, and the man's blue shirt and gray trousers. To look more objectively at the colors, in PS, sampling a section of the color car's paint (a little under the "Cooper" nameplate) gives the numbers 78, 78, 104. That's not a Mini Cooper color (should be pure silver). I don't think it is me or my monitor (a Dell 2408WFP profiled with Color Eyes Display Pro and a Gretag/Macbeth Eye One device). Maybe I'm just overly sensitive to it. I always felt that my Nikon scanner produced a blue cast. And is have the color management in Firefox 3 enabled -- that's the first thing I did when I installed it. In PS, the profile is read as sRGB.



Edited on Sep 07, 2008 at 06:53 PM



Sep 07, 2008 at 06:52 PM
mawz
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #15 · p.4 #15 · Post your recent film shots!


Lotusm50 wrote:
This is odd, because, as I said, I don't see the purple cast in any other images. I even downloaded the file and pulled it into CS3 and the cast is still there -- so it's not just the browser. Maybe it how we are defining "cast". It's not really evident in the first image of the sky and skyscraper, but in the 2nd and 3rd it is. The second also appears over contrasty and over saturated (the oranges and reds of the streetlight and car light, and green patina of the church steeple are very, very strong. In the
...Show more

Saturation in the second image is boosted over the scan (I worked the image over in PS and CaptureNX). The boost does bring out the cast to a visible amount in the clouds.

I see what you're getting at on the third image, there is possibly still a hint of colour cast in the third image (Although that's not the scanner, Provia 400F has a very slight bias that way). I wouldn't call it visible though, unless you're extremely sensitive to it which it seems you are.

The 4870 definitely does have a cast to its scans, I have to correct each one for it, but it's a far more visible cast than anything shown in these images.


Edited on Sep 08, 2008 at 02:41 AM



Sep 08, 2008 at 02:41 AM
Daniel Buck
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #16 · p.4 #16 · Post your recent film shots!


back to the images!

Here's some from this weekend, from the ones that have dried and been scanned:














Sep 09, 2008 at 07:15 AM
Dim.ka_
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #17 · p.4 #17 · Post your recent film shots!


Great images here!

Would like to share some of mine from 6x17cm format + Provia 100F

Rodenstock Grandagon N 90mm f4.5

f22






Rodenstock Apo-Sironar N 210mm f5.6

f22


f5.6





Sep 09, 2008 at 10:14 AM
Dim.ka_
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #18 · p.4 #18 · Post your recent film shots!


edwardkaraa wrote:
EOS 33, EF 1.4/50, Fujichrome 100

http://k53.pbase.com/o4/00/471900/1/62341414.knRCletI.901.jpg



Very very similar to Riga city















Sep 09, 2008 at 10:21 AM
Daniel Buck
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #19 · p.4 #19 · Post your recent film shots!


Dim.ka_, those shots on the beach are beautiful! well done!


Sep 09, 2008 at 05:22 PM
Dim.ka_
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.4 #20 · p.4 #20 · Post your recent film shots!


Thanks Daniel!

Here is rokkor 58 1.2 + minolta XD7







Mamiya RZ67 + 50mm f4.5 ULD


Edited on Sep 09, 2008 at 10:23 PM



Sep 09, 2008 at 08:15 PM
1       2       3      
4
       5              540       541       end




FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3      
4
       5              540       541       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password