eaglewolf Offline Image Upload: On
|
While the D300 is better than the D200 in my opinion, the D200 still makes great images. It's not unusual for me to use both, but I do it primarily to avoid switching lenses. I much prefer the D300 to the D200, and I'm planning on replacing it and my D100 with either another D300 or a D3 next year.
But everyone is different. Many here prefer a D1X to a non-pro body like the D300 (if you can call the D300 a "non-pro body" - something some will debate.) I wouldn't choose the D200 over the D300 on a regular basis, but that photographer isn't me. I will say that every camera has a learning curve, so maybe this one was just more familiar with how to get the best results from the D200 than he was with the D300. Or maybe there was something wrong with the D300 (it does happen every now and then.)
Other than that, it's anyone's guess.
I didn't really take your post as a flame, and I'm not one that thinks Nikon has all the answers. They just make the gear that mates best to my current gear, saving me the (considerable) expense of replacing some superb gear. Both Canon and Nikon make great gear and I don't hesitate to recommend either to someone else.
David
|