Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Hosting

Moderated by: guardian
Username   Password

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
Canon SLRs, primes, and zooms lenses reviews
FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload
1
2 end
Archive 2008 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D? Go to previous topic Go to next topic
SuperSang
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #1 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


I'm not sure if it's mentioned here yet. What's your thought on this?

http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/canon_xs_1000D_dpp34.html



May 13, 2008 at 11:52 PM
Matt Lomeli
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #2 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Is this Canon's "Nikon D40". I was pretty sure the xxxD was as low as Canon was going to go...who knows though. Powershot dSLR?

Edited by Matt Lomeli on May 16, 2008 at 12:42 AM GMT

Edited on May 16, 2008 at 07:42 AM


May 14, 2008 at 12:18 AM
Stunnaz
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #3 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Probably will not get too hyped up in this forum since most of us own a more advanced SLR. However, it's a good move by Canon. You win the DSLR battle in the entry level, so the more/better cheap bodies available the better it is for Canon.

May 14, 2008 at 12:20 AM
RobertP
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #4 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Maybe an ultra cheap, ultra plasticky 8-10MP body, that only comes in silver and has lots of green and red LED lights to make it look like a toy.

May 14, 2008 at 12:31 AM
mostlyprudent
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #5 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Maybe Canon will follow Nikon here and pull out the internal motor so you will only get AF with USM lenses. I hope it's not suprisingly good, since I just ordered an XSi!

May 14, 2008 at 12:43 AM
Xavier Rival
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #6 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


mostlyprudent wrote:
Maybe Canon will follow Nikon here and pull out the internal motor so you will only get AF with USM lenses. I hope it's not suprisingly good, since I just ordered an XSi!


Not sure I understand what you mean, but I think all EF lenses have focus motor inside them; USM is just a kind of motor, that is faster (and of course, among USM lenses, there is a lot of variation in AF speed as well... but that is another matter).

May 14, 2008 at 07:32 AM
Mark Shaxted
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #7 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


This is excellent news for 1.6x users. The current xxD & xxxD are too closely specified. This will allow canon to 'beef up' the 50D closer the the D300 (meaning more AF points?).

Mind you, I'd imagine this hyperthetical new camera might upset some 1 series users with it's probable new advanced software - face recognition, smile recognition, bad hair day technology (tm)* etc


*Bad hair day reduction technology works a little like red eye reduction, by detecting dodgy barnets. Picture Styles will be replaced with uploadable Hair Styles - and the new DPP will include Hair Style editor.

Edited by Mark Shaxted on May 14, 2008 at 09:06 AM GMT

Edited on May 14, 2008 at 08:06 AM


May 14, 2008 at 07:56 AM
EOS20
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #8 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


1DMkIII AF In the 50D!



May 14, 2008 at 07:58 AM
Mark Shaxted
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #9 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Mind you, it's bad news in that there's no mention of the 5DmkII

May 14, 2008 at 08:01 AM
Mark Shaxted
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #10 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


EOS20 wrote:
1DMkIII AF In the 50D!



I hope not!

May 14, 2008 at 08:02 AM
Andy Witkowski
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #11 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Would be a nice venue to introduce in-body IS.

Edited on May 14, 2008 at 01:21 PM


May 14, 2008 at 01:21 PM
cogitech
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #12 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Xavier Rival wrote:
mostlyprudent wrote:
Maybe Canon will follow Nikon here and pull out the internal motor so you will only get AF with USM lenses. I hope it's not suprisingly good, since I just ordered an XSi!


Not sure I understand what you mean, but I think all EF lenses have focus motor inside them; USM is just a kind of motor, that is faster (and of course, among USM lenses, there is a lot of variation in AF speed as well... but that is another matter).


You are correct, Mr. Rival. No EOS body has a focus motor.

May 14, 2008 at 09:09 PM
Eric Gottesman
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #13 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Andy Witkowski wrote:
Would be a nice venue to introduce in-body IS.


The beauty of Canon is you can use the best lenses with all of the bodies from low to high. Internal IS would make me believe that the body wouldn't be compatible with the IS series.

-Eric

May 14, 2008 at 09:51 PM
digitalbug30d
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #14 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


they should put an old FD mount on it

May 15, 2008 at 02:37 AM
Steven Park
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #15 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Another entry level 1.6X crop body?

Is there any chance of entry level dslr w/ FF near future?

Am I hoping too much?

Edited on May 15, 2008 at 02:47 AM


May 15, 2008 at 02:47 AM
400d
Online
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #16 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


digitalbug30d wrote:
they should put an old FD mount on it

Perhaps it's a digital RF?

Edited on May 15, 2008 at 02:49 AM


May 15, 2008 at 02:48 AM
adam613
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #17 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Steven Park wrote:
Another entry level 1.6X crop body?


Who says this is going to be a 1.6x crop? I wouldn't be surprised to see an even smaller sensor with an EF mount...and that would certainly drive the price down...

May 15, 2008 at 02:50 AM
Steven Park
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #18 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


adam613 wrote:

Who says this is going to be a 1.6x crop? I wouldn't be surprised to see an even smaller sensor with an EF mount...and that would certainly drive the price down...


I doubt Canon will introduce smaller sensor but you'd never know...

May 15, 2008 at 02:54 AM
Andy Witkowski
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #19 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Eric Gottesman wrote:
Andy Witkowski wrote:
Would be a nice venue to introduce in-body IS.


The beauty of Canon is you can use the best lenses with all of the bodies from low to high. Internal IS would make me believe that the body wouldn't be compatible with the IS series.

-Eric



Maybe have some logic to determine if lens based IS is available and use it, otherwise use the in camera IS.

May 15, 2008 at 01:49 PM
tom s
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #20 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


It's a low end camera with an improved live view AF system and with a 3.5 '' screen.
Canon made sure to include some lovely video games in it, so you can enjoy your LCD.

Edited on May 15, 2008 at 02:52 PM


May 15, 2008 at 02:51 PM
CKrueger
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #21 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Eric Gottesman wrote:
Andy Witkowski wrote:
Would be a nice venue to introduce in-body IS.


The beauty of Canon is you can use the best lenses with all of the bodies from low to high. Internal IS would make me believe that the body wouldn't be compatible with the IS series.

-Eric


I doubt that. Four Thirds made it work. Panasonic/Leica sell a lens with IS, and Olympus makes a body with IS. If you want to you can turn both on, but it makes shots blurry. Just turn off the in-body IS when using the lens with IS, and all is good.

Canon could implement in-body IS even better: detect an IS lens (this is already possible, as lenses tell the body what they are) and disable in-body IS for those lenses. No user intervention required.

I doubt they'll do this, however. Canon is big into their "lens-based IS is superior" myth.

May 15, 2008 at 04:14 PM
Mark Shaxted
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #22 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


CKrueger wrote:
I doubt they'll do this, however. Canon is big into their "lens-based IS is superior" myth.


Of the 33 EF (not EF-S) prime & zoom lenses BELOW 200mm, only 2 (6%) have IS. Of the 41 lenses up to and INCLUDING 200mm, a massive 5 (12%) have IS. Hardly impressive really!

24-105
28-135
70-200/2.8
70-200/4
200/2

Edited on May 15, 2008 at 04:29 PM


May 15, 2008 at 04:27 PM
Andy Witkowski
Offline
Image Upload: Off
p.1 #23 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


CKrueger wrote:
Eric Gottesman wrote:
Andy Witkowski wrote:
Would be a nice venue to introduce in-body IS.


The beauty of Canon is you can use the best lenses with all of the bodies from low to high. Internal IS would make me believe that the body wouldn't be compatible with the IS series.

-Eric


I doubt that. Four Thirds made it work. Panasonic/Leica sell a lens with IS, and Olympus makes a body with IS. If you want to you can turn both on, but it makes shots blurry. Just turn off the in-body IS when using the lens with IS, and all is good.

Canon could implement in-body IS even better: detect an IS lens (this is already possible, as lenses tell the body what they are) and disable in-body IS for those lenses. No user intervention required.

I doubt they'll do this, however. Canon is big into their "lens-based IS is superior" myth.


I would guess the typical buyer of this entry level camera might not even buy more than 1 additional lens (short telephoto zoom). This camera is born from the marketing side of the house. To say you can have a 18-55 55-200 stabilized system for less than $700 would be a hit.


Edited on May 15, 2008 at 06:44 PM


May 15, 2008 at 06:43 PM
RobertLynn
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #24 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Why is it bad news no mention of the 5d2? Unlike the other series of cameras Canon releases, the 5D holds the test of time so far.

Honestly, an updated version would be nice, but at the same time isn't it awesome to know that the 5D kicks as much a$$ as it does?

May 21, 2008 at 10:55 PM
Clovermead
Offline
Buy and Sell: On
p.1 #25 · Canon EOS Rebel XS/1000D?


Exactly. The 5D doesn't really need an update imo.

May 22, 2008 at 01:55 AM

FM Forums | Canon-mount SLRs | Join Image Upload
1
2 end
  Go to previous topic Go to next topic

You are not logged in. Login or Register

  Username   Password  
Lost password?