Canon 100-400...leave it or take it? - FM Forums

Register · Software · Search · Image Upload · Buy & Sell · Reviews · Hosting

Moderated by: guardian

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules
Rules: One new topic per day

FM Forums | Nature & Wildlife | Join Image Upload
end

Ken Clacher
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #1 · Canon 100-400...leave it or take it?

I am going on a safari to India early next year and I have pretty much sorted out the gear that I am taking. The trip involves 6-7 days of safari tracking tigers etc either on elephant back or by jeep, followed by 2 days in Agra and a couple more travelling around. The kit so far is:

Canon 1D mkIII, Canon 5D, 300mm f2.8 IS, 70-200mm f2.8 IS, 24-70mm f2.8, 17-40 f4, 1.4 and 2x TC's and either my 15mm fisheye or 85mm f1.2 (probably the 85mm).

My question is this...would you bother with the 100-400mm or would you leave it at home? I have found that since buying the 300mm that the 100-400 has stayed at home, but the versatility of the lens may be of use on the safari.

So for those who have done similar trips, what would you do?

Many thanks in advance

Ken Clacher

Mar 25, 2008 at 09:20 PM

RikWriter
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #2 · Canon 100-400...leave it or take it?

IMHO, while you're out looking for tigers, you'd do well to have the 300 on your MKIII and the 100-400 on your 5D. If you leave anything home, I'd leave the 70-200.

Mar 25, 2008 at 09:27 PM

catfriend
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #3 · Canon 100-400...leave it or take it?

Where are you going to see the tigers? I've been to Kanha and had the fortune to see them each time I was in the park. In my experience there when you track the tigers via elephant in the morning you get quite close to them. Not so close they can touch you, but 70-200 close for sure. However, if you are travelling around the park by jeep they can be aways away - the 100-400 would come in handy in this case. You mention additional travelling. Where? Keoladeo is only a few hours from Agra. If you're going there you will definitely want the 100-400. I would take the 100-400.

Mar 25, 2008 at 09:47 PM

Aaron Jors
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #4 · Canon 100-400...leave it or take it?

I've never been on a safari but I myself would go out and buy a 100-400 just for the trip. The flexability the 100-400 offers I think is a must, for most people this is a once in a lifetime experience and you don't want to miss the shot.

Mar 25, 2008 at 11:11 PM

natalia.atkins
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #5 · Canon 100-400...leave it or take it?

Wow, awesome set up, Ken. I don't know the answer! I agree you should make a decision between the 70-200mm IS f/2,8 and the 100-400mm IS. The 70-200mm +/- 1.4 TC could give you enough zoom range.

If I had your kit, I'd be trying to shoot as much as I can with the 300mm f/2.8 IS. Its not only an extraordinary quality lens, its highly versatile and 300mm + TC's is really a great focal length. You won't get the same quality with a 100-400mm zoom, especially for birds (unless yours is a rare sharp copy). You might `get the shot' but you have to weight that up against quality I guess.

Have fun on your safari! I am so envious

Mar 25, 2008 at 11:49 PM

Ken Clacher
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #6 · Canon 100-400...leave it or take it?

Thanks guys, I think the 100-400 comes along for the trip. I just have to figure out how to get the gear there now.

Ken

Mar 26, 2008 at 08:44 PM

netminder0
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #7 · Canon 100-400...leave it or take it?

Newmann: "Just crease, crumple, cram. You'll do fine."

Sorry, couldn't pass up on the Seinfeld shoutout.

Mar 28, 2008 at 04:32 AM

B Benson
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #8 · Canon 100-400...leave it or take it?

Just got back from Murchison Falls, Uganda and the 100-400 was used all the timne. The 70-200 never came out of the bag. Take the 100-400. Bruce

Mar 28, 2008 at 04:34 PM


FM Forums \| Nature & Wildlife \| Join Image Upload end