chris78cpr Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.1 #17 · An expensive LCD monitor or an average LCD & a calibrate tool? | |
Mike Mahoney wrote:
Taylor Barrett wrote:
I'm a little lost on what you're talking about. As far as I'm aware, there is no such thing is a commercially available 22" LCD that costs more then $600.
As a general rule of thumb, 22"s are terrible monitors. With the exception of the Lenovo 220x, they all feature the same resolution (1680x1050) as a 20" lcd, which means a garbage pixel pitch.
Alongside that, you've got the fact that they're all TN panels (except the Lenovo), which are horrific for photography due to poor color reproduction, bad viewing angles etc.
You'll either want a high end 23" or 24" LCD for what you want to spend (Apple Cinema Display, NEC) on the low end, or a 30" LCD like the Dell 3007WFP for the $1200 range.
No monitor comes well calibrated, but the NEC's are pretty close.
You really don't need to spend more then $200 on a hardware calibration tool - a nice Spyder calibrator or Huey do great jobs.
Remember - you will never, no matter how calibrated it is, get good quality out of a 22" monitor.
Keep your eye out for S-IPS panels because they are the highest quality of the available panel types. PVA and MVA are in second place, with TN as by far the worst for photography/color accurate work.
This is all very good advice .. except I would add the 24" iMac has a very nice S-IPS panel monitor.
Do you know if the 20" Imac has a S-IPS panel?
I have a 20" Imac Core Duo 2, not latest metal one, the previous white plastic one.
I also use a Dell 20" 2007 screen that i believe has a very good panel in it as i find that the dell screen is much more accurate than my imac even when both calibrated in identical light with a Spyder 2 Pro.
Chris
|