erickb Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.3 #1 · 5D vs the Hasselblad H3D-II | |
ShaneEngelking wrote:
For your work, yes. For me, I like to shoot a lot of different stuff. Like musicians in dimly lit bars. 200 ISO won't cut it. I am sure the best of both worlds would be to have both kinds of cameras, but if i had to choose one to use, it would most certainly be the 5D. I don't need the AF of the 1 series, nor their bulk, nor their increased MP which only arguable increase the detail you resolve, and if so by a very small amount ( http://www.outbackphoto.com/reviews/equipment/canon_5D/Canon_5D_review.html ) while loosing high ISO quality due to decreased light gathering abilities. What "I" want is a camera that can do just about anything well, and really IMO the most versatile camera is the 5D or possibly the Mark 3, but i don't shoot sports very often, so I'll take the FF and the extra MP.
the 1Ds Mark III is very versatile and a strong camera, I think some day I'll sell my 5D
|