mdude85 Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.4 #1 · Image used without permission!!! | |
granitepoint wrote:
wonder why so many sites state that :
"Before an infringement suit may be filed in court, registration is necessary for works of U.S. origin." I have seen this on the USCO and several law related sites. Is that bogus?
Sounds like someone is mistaken. I am wondering which is correct. Do you have any references that would validate your statement? I am not doubting you or wanting to be a troll, just want to get the facts. Without registration how do you prove in court that you own the copyright? You know with the rules of edvidence and such. Any lawyers out there that want to jump in on this?
I'm not a lawyer but I know the answer to this. "Court" is an awfully broad term to be throwing around. IF the work is not registered, the "court" can file injunction against defendant to pay perhaps court costs and losses. IF work is registered, injunction can be filed - and - plaintiff can take defendent to "court" and seek [statutory] damages.
Losses = what you lose in profits from having your copyright work stolen for a period of time, i.e. per copy
Damages = some order of magnitude greater than the price the defendent would have paid to obtain the right to legally use the copyrighted work, i.e. per work.
USCL Tit. 17
Edited on Apr 17, 2008 at 10:19 PM
|