fredmiranda.com
Login

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2008 · 2.9.08

  
 
J Kaeding
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · 2.9.08


Realized posting these in the wedding area may not have been the best place.

I am just beginning on these from Sat. but I thought I would post a few now for some C&C.

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.




Edited by J Kaeding on Feb 11, 2008 at 04:56 PM GMT


Edited on Feb 11, 2008 at 05:56 PM



Feb 11, 2008 at 02:29 PM
j.curtis
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · 2.9.08


How did you manage to post images that won't be taken until next month?


Feb 11, 2008 at 05:30 PM
J Kaeding
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · 2.9.08


wasn't that difficult actually (thanks)


Feb 11, 2008 at 05:56 PM
Scott Stoness
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · 2.9.08


1 I would crop lots of the top. I woudl also crop out the flowers on the left. This focesses the viewer on the main subject.

2 would be better if you got the bottoms of their legs

3 the background is very distracting. I would blur it with magic wand and average blur

4 is soft and has an akward frame through the hips -the rule of thumb is to frame away from joints. I think this needs to be cropped much closer. The background is competing with the main subject.

5 I like the picture but would crop off some top. Nice emotions and interesting.

6 is good but I would crop closer

7 i would crop of the nose on the left - leaving 1/2 the face looks awkward

8 I would crop tighter too - the posture makes her look chubby - and she is not - cropping off top and bottom would improve.

9 is good but I would I would make less centred by cropping just to increase the interest

10 is a nice shot - the banding behind is distracting a bit - I would try selecting the backgroudn and average blur to improve - but I like it

11is good for me. If you had a chance to reshoot I would choose a less textured background

12 is good but a little square - I would trim off a bit to the left to see if it improves and bring out the details in her dress with highlights/shadows.

13 is nice but I would trim a bit off the top

I have never shot a wedding or any other event for money and I am sure it is difficult so take my comments as they are intended - to be constructive.



Feb 12, 2008 at 12:14 AM
J Kaeding
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · 2.9.08


!! that's why I posted them... for critiques!

I really appreciate you taking the time to touch on them all. And a bit glad to hear your cropping advice. All of these were most likely cropped a bit from the original, so it should be easy corrections, that will really enhance the images. I'll keep it in mind as i go through the rest. It is probably the thing i pay the least attention to- so you saying it so often is great, because now I will know to pay more attention.

I really wanted to step away from my norms on this wedding, but to be honest, I think i stayed in my box way too much. I have vowed for more off camera lighting next time around.



Feb 12, 2008 at 08:23 AM
Bob Jarman
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · 2.9.08


First, I have no experience shooting weddings - tried several of a relative's (not during ceremony) and the results were OK but I would categorize as "something family would like", IYKWIM.

On the B&Ws, I suggest a slightly warmer tone (but then it may be this monitor) . I prefer #1 to all, and agree with Scott re cropping etc.

Slightly different question: the Exifs indicate a D3, which (I have a D70 & 70s) from what I've read and seen in the Nikon forum is a killer at high ISO in available light. The Exifs seem to indicate you shot at ISO AUTO (ISO varies across images - I may be totally wrong here) and used a flash occasionally. If this is the case, may I inquire what caused you to select these settings? Is it to control for DOF?

Thanks,

my 2-cents (BTW, the facial resemblance between the bride and groom is remarkable)

Bob



Feb 12, 2008 at 08:35 AM
J Kaeding
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · 2.9.08


You think they look alike? that's funny. people say me and my husband look like we could be siblings. If you could see them compared to their respective families you may think different. He and his sister look just alike, and much like their parents... and her and her sister look like a good match for their parents too. They make a great couple i think... plus they are just plain nice!

The B&W thing. i don't think i understand what you are saying. They are desaturated, not blue or any other color really... so if they look really blue on your screen, i'd say- yea, run a calibration! I'm calibrated here and at home, and I don't see blue- but if someone else does, please jump in!

I am shooting with the D3. I didn't use ISO auto, although I seriously considered it. I just was changing it thoroughout the day to see what it could do. I probably will set it to Auto ISO for my next wedding becasue you can set a max, and then just set it on manual to control my DOF, etc. Everything up to 6400 was just fantastic.... and don't get me wrong, properly exposed, 6400 was totally useable. This camera is amazing. I used fill flash as I thought it was needed, mostly I am bouncing, just fill in those cases.

Thanks for your comments!

Edited on Feb 12, 2008 at 10:05 AM



Feb 12, 2008 at 10:00 AM
Bob Jarman
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · 2.9.08


Yes, this monitor is not calibrated - I'd have a hard time explaining that to my boss I'll have another look at home - typically I prefer a slightly warm tone, but then that's just me.

Later: yep, calibrated monitor looks much better

I've read amazing things about the D3 - one day I hope to get a D300, but frankly, I've yet to fully utilize what I already have.

regards,

Bob



Edited on Feb 12, 2008 at 07:01 PM



Feb 12, 2008 at 11:51 AM





FM Forums | Photo Critique | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

Welcome back
Log in to your account