Jman13 Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
p.3 #3 · WOW! G9 Trounces F31fd. | |
bias_hjorth wrote:
Thanks for the test although to me this is more of a how slow can you go with each camera rather than a test of image quality since F31 iso 800 and 1600 shot are shaken and blurred.
"As you can see, the G9 resolves far more detail at the hand holding limit, even with the grainy output at ISO 800. The good news is, even though there is visible noise at 100%, "
How can you test image quality in this case when the F31 shot is shaken and blurred?
Because I shoot mostly still subjects (and in dark light with a P&S, if I'm shooting people, I'll probably just use the flash, since it's likely a snapshot, not an artistic outing), and I rarely carry a pocket tripod when I have my P&S. If I'm out for solely photographic purposes, I have my 30D with me. What's important to me is this: which camera can I get a usable shot with in the lowest light. IS / lens speed / ISO all are a part of that equation. The fact is, the G9 is better at getting me the shots I want in the light I need.
Take this for example...walking home after the football game, with no tripod, just the G9 in my pocket, and I took this shot at ISO 100, because I was able to semi-brace the camera (but not real securely), and this is at 0.8 seconds....no POSSIBLE way this shot is sharp with the F31 at ISO 100...I'd need probably 400 or 800,and at that point, the image quality is nowhere near the G9. (I also prefer the G9's noise characteristic...the F31's is too painterly and processed in my opinion, but that's personal preference).

|