Seattle Photographer's Rights Upheld

Moderated by: Fred Miranda

Visit the FM Store · Image Upload · Buy & Sell
FM Forum Rules

FM Forums | Forum & miscellaneous | Join Image Upload
end

Soenda
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #1 · Seattle Photographer's Rights Upheld

I often see this topic discussed here, but didn't know if this Seattle incident had been brought to the FM forum.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004003761_photographer09m.html

Edited on Nov 12, 2007 at 05:17 PM

Nov 10, 2007 at 06:26 AM

EltonTeng
Online
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #2 · Seattle Photographer's Rights Upheld

I would've gotten him $20K - Fletcher Reed (from "Liar Liar")

Edited on Nov 12, 2007 at 05:17 PM

Nov 10, 2007 at 06:34 AM

nathanlake
Offline
Image Upload: On

p.1 #3 · Seattle Photographer's Rights Upheld

What is the definition of an "amateur photographer"? Is anyone that carries a camera and does not get paid for doing so an amateur photrgrapher?

Edited on Nov 12, 2007 at 05:17 PM

Nov 12, 2007 at 01:17 AM

waileong
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #4 · Seattle Photographer's Rights Upheld

It's quite clear. You don't make a living from photography, either directly (eg selling pictures) or indirectly (eg teaching).

Edited on Nov 12, 2007 at 05:17 PM

Nov 12, 2007 at 11:39 AM

claudermilk
Offline
Image Upload: Off

p.1 #5 · Seattle Photographer's Rights Upheld

I saw that earlier. Glad to see some common sense breaking out & cops acting improperly getting disciplined.

BTW, who cares about his amateur/pro status? It's irrelevant.

Nov 12, 2007 at 05:17 PM


FM Forums \| Forum & miscellaneous \| Join Image Upload end