Conner999 Offline Dedicated FM Upload & Sell: On
|
It's been awhile since I visited this thread, but on the question of handling, if you don't 'take' to a lens you'll refrain from using it and then it's just wasted money.
As much as the IQ was amazing in most situations, on the handling front, I found the 35 ok. The focus is smooth (unlike some very stiff 100/2 focus rings), but a little 'fast' - very easy to throw your focus point off with just a touch on the focus ring. Aperture is ok - the usual Nikon 'wrong' direction, but a bit notchy. Pointer - re-check focus after you stop-down.
Unlike older CZ lenses, I got the impression the ZF line is built to a price point by Cosina. I returned by VERY sharp and otherwise stellar 100 ZF due to an intolerably stiff (as in in stick in cement) focus ring. In short, optical formulas set in Germany, body designed and manufactured to a standard by Zeiss's new holding company that I think falls a little short of old school Zeiss.
I eventually (reluctantly) sold my 35 - sharp, great color, but didn't like the way it would show color fringing at the drop of a hat in high contrast sits (I used, for now, the 1Ds2, it may behave differently with other sensors).
Am tempted by the 50/2 as it is reported to be well corrected for CA, sharp and with no stiff focus mechs reported, but it does have that #$%^&* "aperture ring in a narrow valley" design shared with the 100/ZF (see www.pebbleplace.com for more details) and I think the 85/1.4...
Edited by Conner999 on Jul 02, 2008 at 12:24 PM GMT
|