Steen Bondo Offline Image Upload: On
|
grega wrote:
"200d and 30d are not even close in the price level and therefore they are not competing for the same market segment. 30d is great camera for the price. I would prefer camera in 200d range though and I hope that canon would make it someday."
Grega, that last remark of yours is exactly my point. Me too, I had also hoped for a Canon camera in the same range and at a sharp competitive price.
As far as I know the Nikon D200 in the US is $1.699 and the Canon 30D will be $1.399 - or did I miss something here?
If so, the price difference is in other words $300 which equals 21% of the Canon price and 18% of the Nikon price.
To my eyes they are therefore pricewise sufficiently close to justify a careful comparison before I would make my own decision.
And then it makes quite an important impression to me that the D200 with its large viewfinder opens the door to a different world of german Zeiss ZF manual focus lenses which I expect to be the result of a completely different qualitycontrol than the usual Canon and Nikon happy go lucky casino where you never know if you draw a good or a bad sample of a lense on the roulette.
Alternatively you could get access to the awesom german Zeiss and even Leica glass by purchasing Canon 5D plus adapters, but this option belongs in a much higher pricelevel.
5D is still so expensive that I think in that case one might as well wait for the real thing: the Leica M rangefinder camera expected at the end of the year 2006.
Just my personal thoughts on this 30D announcement.
Kind regards
Steen Bondo
Edited on Feb 23, 2006 at 12:06 AM
|