the1sen Offline Image Upload: Off
|
p.1 #1 · uncertainty in buying | |
You know, for those of us who are finally able to buy a more expensive camera, and who have respect for both Nikon and Canon, the buying game has become a confusing ordeal.
Nikon has been taking a beating on almost every photographic related forum I have read in the recent past few weeks for D200 banding issues. Still, the photos posted from non-defective cameras are just stunning...
Canon is debuting their 20d replacement shortly, and to be completely blunt, I am completely confused as my loyalty is simply to the better machine and glass.
Glass from Canon is amazing. Glass from Nikon is amazing. As I understand it, Nikon of today is for artists, while Canon is more about the science... however, to buy a fairly versatile lens (the 28mm-300mm "L" Lens with IS) will cost $2k+USD and the Nikon solution to versatility (17mm-200mm with VR) is $750USD... Both, I am certain would render some amazing shots, but what a hefty price to pay on the Canon side...
I began shooting with an older Nikon setup I inherited from my dad when I was 10. In the Digital world, I've shot with a 10d, a D-70, a Rebel XT, and an Oly C-8080.
I would like to ask, with all due respect, which setup really is better in different situations. Canon and Nikon have always had some fierce rivalries going. The reality of expense vs. value has me wondering where the digital photography world is headed; 2+ years ago when the 300d was introduced with a ridiculously cheap build quality, but undeniably capable and beautiful competence as a photographic tool... Now, the D200 comes out and the build quality issues of a less expensive alternative have been addressed except for when it's taking pictures? Frankly, Quality is not something I am monetarily able to compromise on, and I don't know what to do.
Any help anyone can offer would be most appreciated.
Edited on Feb 02, 2006 at 01:38 PM
|