PhotoPhreak Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.5 #20 · Modded 5D and Leica Lenses | |
Well, well... here we have a near-midget that matches "giants"...
...or a potential David on his way to defeat Golias?
Let me explain what I mean:
It is widely accepted that MF backs are great in resolving but they are not incredibly good at high ISO speeds, am I wrong?
If I am not (to which I know the answer), then for high ISOs, then we have only the two remaining competitors here, don't we? (stay with me...) which are the Canons, ok?
If the theory of the larger pixels/reduced noise holds true, then at the highest ISOs we have a clear winner, right? No mistery on which one that is!
More importantly, for the same reason, a clean image can enlarge more (as in "upsized" with Genuine Fractals, Bicubic and the likes) if there is less noise (try this, and you'll see for yourself).
The conclusion is that if I want to upsize from 12.8 to, say, 29 MP (just a number picked random, but contained within reason) I have a very good chance of getting an equal, if not better (due to noise) image file and ultimately print size.
I can easily print, as I did, super A3 (13"x19") photos from my 1D Mk2 with just the usual basics like levels and USM in Photoshop and these have come out absolutely stunning, so this leaves me wondering about what I could do with the 5D, given the same pixel size of 8.2 micron and the fact that it has 55% more pixels...
Something to think about...
|